This comparison draws in part from “A Dialogue on Black Women Paving a Way Towards an Inclusive Future in Behavior Analysis” by Marlesha Bell, Ph.D., BCBA (BehaviorLive), and extends it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. The decision framework, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →Organizations seeking to support Black women and other underrepresented groups in behavior analysis typically choose between two broad approaches. Awareness-based approaches focus on changing individual attitudes and knowledge through diversity training, implicit bias workshops, and cultural competency seminars. Structural equity interventions focus on changing organizational systems, policies, and contingencies that produce disparate outcomes. Both approaches aim to create more inclusive environments, but they differ substantially in their mechanisms and outcomes.
The behavioral perspective favors structural interventions because they target the environmental contingencies that maintain inequitable patterns rather than relying on attitudinal change to produce behavior change. This comparison examines how these two approaches differ across dimensions that behavior analysts will recognize as relevant to effective intervention design.
| Factor | Evidence-Based Approach | Traditional Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Target of Intervention | Organizational policies, systems, and contingencies that produce disparate outcomes, such as hiring criteria, promotion processes, and accountability mechanisms | Individual attitudes, awareness, and knowledge about bias, diversity, and inclusion through training and educational programming |
| Mechanism of Change | Changes the contingencies that maintain inequitable behavior patterns: modifies antecedent conditions, alters consequence structures, and removes barriers to equitable participation | Relies on increased awareness and knowledge transfer to produce voluntary behavior change among individuals in the organization |
| Measurability | Produces measurable outcomes: representation at each organizational level, time-to-promotion by demographic group, retention rates, climate survey scores disaggregated by race and gender | Typically measured through training completion rates, pre/post knowledge assessments, and participant satisfaction scores that may not correlate with actual behavior change |
| Durability | Changes are maintained because they are embedded in organizational structures and do not depend on ongoing individual motivation or memory of training content | Effects tend to diminish over time as the training becomes a distant antecedent. Research on diversity training shows that effects on attitudes and behavior often fade within weeks to months |
| Risk of Backlash | May encounter resistance from those who benefit from current structures, but resistance can be addressed through clear rationale, stakeholder input, and demonstrated benefits to organizational performance | Can produce backlash when participants perceive training as blaming or accusatory, potentially worsening intergroup relationships in some contexts |
| Resource Requirements | Requires leadership commitment, policy review, data infrastructure, and ongoing monitoring. Higher upfront investment but produces sustainable change that reduces long-term costs of turnover and disengagement | Lower upfront cost per event. Often treated as a one-time or annual activity. May create appearance of action without producing substantive change |
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Use this framework when approaching a dialogue on black women paving a way towards an inclusive future in behavior analysis in your practice:
Does the data support a need for intervention? Is there a meaningful impact on the individual's quality of life, safety, or access to reinforcement?
YES → Proceed to assessment NO → Document reasoning, monitor
A functional assessment should guide intervention selection. Avoid defaulting to standard protocols without individual analysis. Consider environmental variables, setting events, and private events.
YES → Select evidence-based approach matched to function NO → Complete assessment first
Goals should be co-developed. Assent and informed consent are ethical requirements. The individual's preferences and values matter in selecting both goals and methods.
YES → Proceed with collaborative plan NO → Engage in shared decision-making
This course covers the clinical and ethical dimensions in detail with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
A Dialogue on Black Women Paving a Way Towards an Inclusive Future in Behavior Analysis — Marlesha Bell · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $10
Take This Course →We extended this decision guide with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind each approach, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
239 research articles with practitioner takeaways
200 research articles with practitioner takeaways
200 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $10 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide
Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.