Service Delivery

Treatment mechanism of the WHO caregiver skills training intervention for autism delivered in community settings

Settanni et al. (2023) · Autism Research 2023
★ The Verdict

Caregiver skill gain is the active ingredient of WHO CST—focus coaching on interaction skills to unlock child progress.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running parent groups in community clinics or schools.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for sleep or marital-counseling protocols.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Settanni et al. (2023) ran a randomized trial of the WHO Caregiver Skills Training (CST).

They enrolled the preschoolers with autism and their caregivers in Italy.

Groups met in local clinics, parks, and community rooms—not in hospitals.

02

What they found

Caregivers who got CST showed large gains in interaction skills.

These skill gains, not the lessons alone, led to small but real child progress.

Kids spent more time in joint play and showed fewer autism-related behaviors.

03

How this fits with other research

Dai et al. (2025) extended this idea. They added hospital DTT before home parent coaching and saw larger child gains plus lower parent stress.

Kleinert et al. (2007) was the first to prove parents can learn DTT with BST coaching. CST uses the same teaching steps but in group form.

Hahlweg et al. (2008) tested a booklet plus phone calls and found only small effects. CST’s live group practice appears to give the bigger skill boost.

04

Why it matters

If you run parent groups, focus your coaching on caregiver interaction skills—those skills are the active ingredient. Use live modeling, role-play, and feedback, not just handouts. When caregivers master clear prompts, shared attention, and positive comments, child joint engagement and autism behaviors improve even in community settings.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Open your next parent group with a 5-minute model-play-demo, then have each caregiver practice and get on-the-spot feedback.

02At a glance

Intervention
parent training
Design
randomized controlled trial
Sample size
86
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

This study examined the mechanism of effect of the WHO Caregiver Skills Training (CST) through secondary analysis of a pilot RCT conducted in community settings. Participants were 86 caregivers (77% mothers) of children with ASD (78% male, mean age: 44.8 months) randomized to CST (n = 43) or treatment as usual (n = 43). The primary outcomes, measured at baseline (t1), immediately post‐intervention (t2), and 3 months post‐intervention (t3), were derived from the coding of caregiver‐child free play interactions with the Brief Observation of Social‐Communication Change (BOSCC) and the Joint Engagement Rating Inventory scale (JERI). At t3 positive treatment main effects had been observed for caregiver skills supportive of the interaction and for flow of the interaction (JERI), albeit only non‐significant changes in the expected direction for child outcomes: autism phenotypic behaviors (BOSCC), joint engagement and availability to interact (JERI). This study tested the theory of change of CST, hypothesizing that the intervention would lead to an improvement on all child and dyad outcomes through an increase in the caregiver skills supportive of the interaction. Serial mediation analyses revealed that the effect of the intervention was significantly influenced by change in caregiver skills. Participation in the intervention led to notable increases in caregiver skills at t2 and t3, which subsequently contributed to improvements at t3 in flow of the interaction, autism phenotypic behavior, joint engagement, and availability to interact. We confirmed our a priori hypothesis showing that change in caregiver skills significantly mediated the effect of treatment on the dyad primary outcome, as well as on the other child outcomes that had shown non‐significant changes in the expected direction. Implications for intervention design and policy making in the context of public health services are discussed.

Autism Research, 2023 · doi:10.1002/aur.3058