The use of modified ride-on cars to maximize mobility and improve socialization-a group design.
Two brief ride-on car sessions each week can nudge both mobility and social play in toddlers with mixed disabilities.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team gave toddlers with mixed disabilities two hours of ride-on car training twice a week.
Sessions took place in a hospital outpatient gym for nine weeks.
Kids drove low-cost toy cars wired with switches they could hit with head, hand, or foot.
What they found
After nine weeks, the children showed small gains in moving around and playing with peers.
The ride-on group did better than kids who got only usual therapy.
How this fits with other research
DeRoma et al. (2004) got big leg-strength gains in school-age girls with Rett syndrome using daily treadmills. The new study extends that idea to younger kids and ride-on cars.
Moll et al. (2023) used a costly robot exoskeleton with adults and saw only tiny, non-significant walking gains. Both papers show hospital robot mobility training can be safe, but gains stay small unless dose or age is right.
Merino-Andrés et al. (2025) added brain stimulation to hand training and found no extra motor benefit, just like the car study shows tech alone does not guarantee large change.
Why it matters
You can borrow the ride-on car setup for almost nothing. Tape a big switch to the toy, let the child drive toward friends, and you build both steps and smiles. Start with five-minute loops, then fade your prompts. The paper says two long sessions beat none, but daily short bursts might work even better—test it and track steps and social bids.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Grab a $50 ride-on toy, add a large push switch, and let your client drive to a peer—count each lap and social approach.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
AIM: To examine the effects of ride-on car (ROC) training versus conventional therapy on mobility and social function in young children with disabilities in a hospital-based environment. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Twenty young children with disabilities, aged 1-3 years, were recruited. The treatment group (n=10) received ROC training of 2h/session, 2 sessions/week for a total of 9 weeks in the hospital environment. The control group (n=10) received conventional therapy alone. Assessments included the Chinese version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory and the Parenting Stress Index. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: After a 9-week intervention, the treatment group showed improvements in mobility and social function, whereas the control group showed improvements in social function alone. Four children in the treatment group had clinically meaningful changes in mobility and 3 in social function, as compared to 2 and 1, respectively, in the control group. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This is the first group study that demonstrated the potential benefits of ROC training on mobility and social function in young children with disabilities in the hospital environment. Future studies should include a larger sample size to detect any differences between ROC training and conventional therapy.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2017 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.01.002