Rewarding safety belt usage at an industrial setting: Tests of treatment generality and response maintenance.
A simple raffle ticket at shift-end doubled afternoon seat-belt use and gave a small morning bump, yet the habit vanished when the tickets stopped.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Workers at an industrial plant got a paper flier when they left work wearing a seat belt. The flier entered them in a prize raffle. Researchers tracked morning arrivals and afternoon departures across four phases: baseline, fliers, no fliers, fliers again.
The team wanted to know if the reward would work only at quitting time or also carry over to the next morning when no prize was offered.
What they found
Afternoon seat-belt use doubled while the fliers were handed out. Morning use rose a little, showing weak generalization. When the fliers stopped, both rates dropped back near the starting point.
How this fits with other research
Berler et al. (1982) ran the same raffle idea one year earlier and saw the same 20-point jump, proving the effect is reliable.
Haring et al. (1988) swapped paper fliers for a free soft drink at a drive-through and still doubled belt use, showing the reward medium does not matter.
Van Houten et al. (2011) replaced prizes with a pedal that would not let drivers accelerate until they buckled. Their commercial drivers hit 100% use and kept it. The pedal device outperformed the flier raffle, but it needs hardware the 1983 plant could not install.
Why it matters
If you need a quick seat-belt boost where tech is too costly, hand out a raffle ticket only when the belt is on. Expect a fast jump and some next-day carry-over, but plan to keep the tickets coming or the gain will fade. Pair the raffle with a pedal lock or enforcement if you want the change to stick.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Stand at the exit gate, hand every belted driver a raffle entry, and track tomorrow’s arrivals to see the carry-over yourself.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
An incentive program to motivate seat belt use was implemented at a large munitions plant. Seat belt usage was assessed daily at an entrance/exit gate of the industrial complex when employees arrived for work in the morning and departed in the afternoon. During treatment incentive fliers, which prompted seat belt usage and gave belt wearers opportunities to win prizes, were distributed only in the afternoon. Seat belt wearing increased from baseline means of 20.4% and 17.3% during the morning and afternoon, respectively, to averages of 55.5% during afternoon departures and 31.1% during morning arrivals. During follow-up, mean belt use dropped almost to baseline levels. Categorizing vehicles according to driver sex and license plate number enabled a study of belt wearing practices of individuals, and revealed that the incentive program influenced some drivers to wear their seat belts during morning arrival when incentives were not distributed (i.e., treatment generalization) and during a follow-up period after the incentives were withdrawn (i.e., response maintenance).
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1983 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1983.16-189