Service Delivery

Racial-ethnic and neighborhood inequities in age of treatment receipt among a national sample of children with autism spectrum disorder.

Yingling et al. (2019) · Autism : the international journal of research and practice 2019
★ The Verdict

Black children and kids in low-cohesion neighborhoods start autism therapy years late—front-load your screening for these families.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who run intake or early-intervention clinics.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only adult or already-diagnosed clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team looked at Autism Treatment Network records for the kids. They asked: when did each child first get autism services?

They compared Black, White, and Hispanic kids. They also checked if families lived in tight-knit or loose neighborhoods.

02

What they found

Black children started therapy almost two years later than White children. Kids in low-cohesion neighborhoods also began months later.

Race and neighborhood each added delay, even after counting money and distance.

03

How this fits with other research

Fombonne et al. (2022) show Black and White kids look the same at referral. This rules out the idea that Black children start later because they have milder symptoms.

Stephens et al. (2018) found family adversity adds delay. Barton et al. (2019) now show race and neighborhood add separate, extra delay.

Straiton-Webster et al. (2025) looked later in the pipe and saw no racial gap in ABA hours once kids are in. Together the papers trace one path: race slows the front door, not the dose after entry.

04

Why it matters

You cannot wait for a “perfect” referral. Add a race and neighborhood check to your intake form. If the family is Black or lists few neighborhood supports, move them to the fast-track evaluation slot and call the doctor within one week.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Flag every new Black family and every family who says neighbors ‘rarely help’—schedule their assessment this week, not next month.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
1309
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of child race-ethnicity and neighborhood characteristics on age of treatment receipt among children with autism spectrum disorder. Here, we included 1309 children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder in the National Survey of Children's Health, 2011-2012. Controlling for key covariates, we used a weighted generalized logit model to analyze differences in age of treatment receipt (<2 years, 2 years, 3 years, and ⩾4 years). Compared to non-Hispanic White children, the relative probability (odds) of entering treatment at 3 years and ⩾4 years rather than <2 years was 326% and 367% higher, respectively, for non-Hispanic Black children. Compared to children whose parents perceived their neighborhood to be cohesive, the relative probability of entering treatment at 2 years and 3 years rather than <2 years was 59% and 61% lower, respectively, for children whose parents did not. Significant racial-ethnic and neighborhood inequities exist in age of treatment receipt, suggesting a need for research that explores the underlying causal mechanisms of inequities.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2019 · doi:10.1177/1362361318791816