Service Delivery

Pushing the employment agenda: case study research of high performing States in integrated employment.

Hall et al. (2007) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2007
★ The Verdict

Three winning states prove that flexible funds, public data, and shared goals drive high integrated-employment rates for adults with IDD.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who help adults with IDD find and keep competitive jobs.
✗ Skip if BCBAs focused only on early-intervention or clinic-based skill building.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Cohen and team visited three states that already had high rates of adults with IDD working real jobs.

They talked to leaders, read policy papers, and watched how the systems ran.

The goal: find the common moves that keep integrated employment alive year after year.

02

What they found

All three winners shared three habits.

First, they let money follow the person, not the building.

Second, they posted clear data every quarter so everyone could see if jobs were growing or shrinking.

Third, they built tight networks where schools, agencies, and businesses all aimed at the same goal: competitive work in regular places.

03

How this fits with other research

Domin et al. (2013) surveyed the whole country and found only a large share of adults with IDD hold integrated jobs. Cohen’s three states beat that number, showing the gap between best and average is still wide.

Wehman et al. (2014) proved supported employment works for transition-age youth. Cohen shows how states can scale that same model for adults.

Hansen et al. (1989) first showed individual placements beat group crews. Cohen’s states used that evidence to write funding rules that favor one-person jobs.

Ferron et al. (2023) gave employment coaches a quick daily check-in tool. Cohen’s systems could adopt that tool to keep quality high as they grow.

04

Why it matters

You can copy the three habits right now. Ask your state for flexible funding. Start sharing simple job counts each month. Invite school teams and employers to one table with a shared target: more real jobs. These moves cost little and lift everyone’s outcomes.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Email your state VR contact and ask for the quarterly integrated-employment data report—then share it with every team that serves your clients.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
case study
Population
intellectual disability, developmental delay
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Organizational variables, including policies, practices, collaborations, and funding mechanisms resulting in high performance in integrated employment, were described through case study research in 3 states. Findings address how contextual factors, system-level strategies, and goals of the system are related as well as how they sustain systems change. Strategies such as flexibility in funding and practices; communication of values through data, rewards, and funding incentives; and innovation diffusion through relationships and training were most successful when they were embedded within the context of a solid values base, a network of dedicated stakeholders, and clarity about systemic goals. Implications are presented with respect to state systems, community rehabilitation providers as partners in planning, and future leadership in the field.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2007 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[182:PTEACS]2.0.CO;2