Prevention of unintentional injury to people with intellectual disability: a review of the evidence.
Injury risk doubles in ID—use childproofing, carer training, and medical tune-ups until better trials arrive.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors read every paper they could find on injury prevention for people with intellectual disability.
They did not run a new experiment. They simply mapped what evidence already exists.
They found almost no studies written just for this group.
What they found
People with ID get hurt about twice as often as everyone else.
The best data still come from child-safety work: plug covers, stair gates, and carer training.
The team also flagged two medical risks: uncontrolled seizures and untreated mental-health problems.
How this fits with other research
Llewellyn et al. (2003) had already proved the point. They taught parents with ID ten home-safety lessons. Safety scores rose and stayed high for three months.
That RCT fills the exact gap Bruns et al. (2004) complain about: no targeted trials.
Later reviews agree on drugs. Willner (2015), Taylor (2002), Cudré-Mauroux (2010), and Matson et al. (2009) all show the same thing: medicines rarely reduce aggression or injury in ID. Behavior plans come first.
Why it matters
You can act now even while we wait for more data. Start with cheap, child-level fixes: cabinet locks, hot-water guards, clear walkways. Add seizure plans and psych reviews. Track every bump and burn. These steps already cut risk in typical kids; the review says they are still our best bet for clients with ID today.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Walk the living space with the client, fit plug covers and corner guards on the spot, then write a one-page seizure and behavior crisis plan.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent research evidence shows that people with intellectual disability (ID) have double the unintentional injury risk of the general population and the risk is further increased in the presence of psychopathology and epilepsy. The pattern of injury and the circumstances surrounding an injury event in those with ID have some similarity with that of young children in the general population. Interventions to prevent injuries are an important health priority in this vulnerable population. This paper reviews evidence from injury prevention studies for people with ID and also considers the relevance of general population injury interventions for this population. METHOD: Information regarding injury prevention in both ID and general populations was identified using online systems and consultation with research and public health organizations. RESULTS: Few published studies were identified addressing the issue of injury prevention for those with ID. Possible injury prevention strategies appropriate for the major causes of injury in the ID population were identified from the general population literature. While many environmental injury prevention strategies for young children in the general population are applicable to the population with ID, some may require design modification to ensure effectiveness. Other promising approaches include improved information for parents/carers, primary care physician counselling, and home visits by well-informed and motivated professionals. There may be injury prevention benefit from improved management of psychopathology and epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: The issue of injury prevention for those with ID has not been addressed to the extent that the magnitude of the problem requires. Injury prevention programmes trialling a variety of evidence-based approaches and strategies are needed to protect the quality of life for the ID population and their families.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2004 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00570.x