Person-centred reviews as a mechanism for planning the post-school transition of young people with intellectual disability.
Person-centred reviews fill the room and focus talk on student dreams, but they do not create new placements out of thin air.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Laugeson et al. (2014) watched real transition meetings for teens with intellectual disability. They compared regular meetings to meetings run with a person-centred review format.
The team counted who showed up and who spoke. They also asked families what happened after the meeting.
What they found
More students and family members came to the person-centred reviews. People talked about the student's hopes, not just test scores.
Yet better meetings did not create more job or college options after school. Good plans alone could not fix limited local services.
How this fits with other research
Vassos et al. (2016) looked at many studies and found the same pattern. Person-centred planning boosts choice-making, but job gains are hit-or-miss.
Webster et al. (2022) seems to disagree. They saw that autistic students were left out of transition planning. The difference is diagnosis and setting. A et al. worked with intellectual disability teams who already welcomed family input. Amanda studied autism-only schools where student voice was new.
Torelli et al. (2023) carried the idea forward. In a huge sample of adults, plans with more person-centred content still predicted higher life control. The benefit lasts beyond high school.
Why it matters
Use person-centred reviews to lift attendance and shift talk to student goals. That is a win you can see on Monday. Just do not promise parents that a nicer meeting will open extra doors. Keep fighting for real job sites and college spots at the same time.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Invite the student to run the next transition meeting slide deck and pick two personal goals to open the discussion.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Person-centred planning has played a key role in the transformation of intellectual disabilities services for more than a decade. The literature has identified clear advantages for service users when service delivery is planned around the individual rather than the user is made to fit into service structures. Researchers however have pointed out that there is a lack of evidence that person-centred planning positively influences outcomes for users. METHOD: Our study examined the application of person-centred planning during transition for young people with intellectual disabilities. We investigated the nature and content of 44 person-centred reviews of transition planning for this population in a local authority in the UK. We carried out a documentary analysis of all person-centred plans and conducted telephone interviews with all families participating in the programme. We focused on the issue of attendance at review meetings and what was discussed during the meetings. RESULTS: Analysis of the data shows an increase in the participation of young people and carers at review meetings and a significant shift in topics discussed during the transition planning process compared with previous programmes. However, some of these effects may dissipate once young people are actually leaving school as planning well is not synonymous with having an improved range of placement options. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that person-centred planning can impact positively on some aspects of transition planning, while it may be too optimistic to expect radical improvement in other area. Key to further improvements is to complement person-centred planning with consistent involvement of all relevant stakeholders in planning for individuals.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2014 · doi:10.1111/jir.12058