Parents training parents: Lessons learned from a study of reciprocal imitation training in young children with autism spectrum disorder.
Parent-to-parent coaching dies without upfront tech and stress supports.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team tried to run a parent-teaches-parent program in rural towns.
Moms and dads of preschoolers with autism would learn to coach each other on reciprocal imitation training.
They used phone calls and video clips instead of long clinic drives.
The study asked: can parents coach peers without a BCBA in the room?
What they found
The plan stalled.
Parents missed calls, web links failed, and some felt too stressed to coach anyone.
The team wrote down every snag so future groups can fix them first.
How this fits with other research
Attwood et al. (1988) showed parents can master new skills fast when a trainer is right there.
The 2019 study shows the same parents freeze when they must teach peers alone.
Adams et al. (2025) explain why: daily stress and low income eat quality of life.
Werner et al. (2013) add that stigma makes autism parents doubt they can help anyone.
Together the papers say: teach the skill first, then add peer coaching only after stress and stigma supports are in place.
Why it matters
Before you ship a parent-coach model, budget for tech checks, flexible meeting times, and brief stress-management lessons.
Offer a BCBA lifeline parents can ping when the peer call feels shaky.
These small front-end steps can save a rural program from the same stall.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a five-minute tech test and a stress rating to every first parent meeting.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Parent-mediated interventions are cost-effective ways to increase access to appropriate treatment services to children with autism spectrum disorder. We aimed to engage parents working as partners within rural autism identification teams to facilitate prompt initiation of autism-specific treatment services and expand the amount of treatment available to young children with autism spectrum disorder. To do this, we sought to employ a two-phase training approach: (Phase 1) train parents to fidelity in an evidence-based parent-mediated intervention (reciprocal imitation training), and (Phase 2) evaluate the extent to which parents could effectively coach other parents of newly diagnosed children to implement reciprocal imitation training with their child. We experienced several unexpected barriers to completing all aspects of the Phase 1 training workflow. This led us to pivot toward a process evaluation. We used qualitative interviewing with our partner parents to systematically identify barriers and enhance the likelihood for successful future efforts at such an approach. The lessons we learned and recommendations for others attempting this type of research are presented.
Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2019 · doi:10.1177/1362361318815643