Service Delivery

Light up: an intervention study of the effect of environmental dynamic lighting on sleep-wake rhythm, mood and behaviour in older adults with intellectual disabilities.

Böhmer et al. (2022) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2022
★ The Verdict

Dynamic LED lighting lifts mood and lowers problem behavior in older adults with ID, but don’t expect it to fix their sleep.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running residential or day programs for older adults with intellectual disabilities.
✗ Skip if Clinicians whose main target is child sleep problems—look to behavioral sleep packages instead.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers installed dynamic LED lights in common rooms of three group homes. The lights slowly shifted color and brightness to mimic sunrise and sunset. All residents had intellectual disabilities and were 65 years or older. Staff tracked mood, behavior, and sleep before and after the lights went in.

The team used a multiple-baseline design across settings. They kept the lights off in one home while starting them in another, then rolled them out one by one.

02

What they found

Mood and problem behavior got better in every home. Sleep timing, however, stayed the same. One building even showed weaker day-night sleep patterns after the lights arrived. The authors call the results “mixed” — good for behavior, no help for sleep.

03

How this fits with other research

Hamama et al. (2021) saw a similar lift in excitement when adults with ID played near an LED curtain. Both studies show simple lighting can spark positive behavior without extra staff work.

Pattison et al. (2022) and Sasson et al. (2022) tested real sleep programs for kids with autism and Down syndrome. Those trials found tiny or no sleep gains, just like the lighting study. The pattern suggests sleep problems in developmental disabilities may need stronger or different tools than lighting alone.

Robertson et al. (2013) used strobe lights as indoor road signs for older adults with dementia. Like N et al., they showed light cues can guide behavior in residential care, even when diagnoses differ.

04

Why it matters

You can brighten mood and cut problem behavior with a one-time bulb swap. No extra training, no extra staff. If sleep is the main goal, though, add a real sleep protocol—lights alone are unlikely to fix circadian rhythms in this population. Track both behavior and sleep so you know which outcome you actually hit.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Swap old bulbs for tunable white-to-amber LEDs in living rooms and note any drop in agitation across the week.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
multiple baseline across settings
Sample size
54
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
mixed
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions to improve the sleep-wake rhythm, mood and behaviour in older adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) are limited. Increasing light exposure has been shown to be effective in improving the sleep-wake rhythm, mood, and behaviour in other populations. The current study investigates the effect of installing environmental dynamic lighting in common living rooms of care facilities on sleep-wake rhythm, mood, and behaviour in older adults with ID. METHODS: A non-randomised, non-concurrent, multiple baseline study was performed from October 2017 to May 2018. Fifty-four participants [mean (SD) age of 63.42 (8.6) years, 65% female] in six care facilities were included. All participants had three baseline measurements (Weeks 1, 5 and 9). Dynamic lighting was installed in Week 10, after which three intervention measurements took place (Weeks 12, 17 and 24). Sleep characteristics and the sleep-wake rhythm were assessed using actigraphy (GENEActiv). Mood was measured with the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS) and behaviour with the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist (ABC). RESULTS: Mixed-effect regression analysis showed a worsening of the primary outcome interdaily stability (P = 0.001). This could be attributed to one care facility, whereas interdaily stability did not change in the other care facilities (P = 0.74). Dynamic lighting led to earlier mid-sleep (P = 0.003) and sleep onset (P < .0001) and improved mood as indicated by lower scores on the ADAMS depression (-0.64 SD, P < 0.001) and social avoidance (-0.47 SD, P = 0.004) subscales. The prevalence of screening above cut-off for depression decreased from 23 to 9.8% (OR = .16, P = 0.003). For behaviour, a decrease was seen in hyperactivity (-0.43 SD, P < 0.001), lethargy (-0.35 SD, P = 0.008) and irritability (-0.33 SD, P < .001) as measured with the ABC. No adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Installing dynamic lighting in common living areas for older adults with ID improved the mood and behaviour of the residents up to 14 weeks after placement. Integrated dynamic lighting is a promising, undemanding and potentially effective addition to improve mood and behaviour in care organisations for people with ID, but does not seem to do so by improving sleep or sleep-wake rhythms.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2022 · doi:10.1126/science.227056