Increasing Sales by Managing the Interlocking Contingencies Between Sales Representatives and Customers Using Behavioral Self-Monitoring
A 10-item self-monitoring checklist doubled sales in three months without extra pay or supervision.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Copeland et al. (2018) gave 10-item self-monitoring checklists to sales reps. The list held short, customer-focused closing lines like asking for the order.
Reps scored themselves after each call for three months. No extra pay, no boss watching.
What they found
Reps using the checklist raised their closing lines by 12 points and sales jumped 126%. Each rep brought in over one million dollars more per year than the control group.
How this fits with other research
The idea of linking staff and client behavior started with Jones et al. (1998). They used manager feedback in disability homes and saw client engagement rise. Copeland keeps the same "interlocking contingencies" idea but moves it to sales and lets reps watch themselves.
Pierce et al. (1983) taught institutional staff a four-step self-management loop. Copeland’s checklist is a sleek, modern version of that loop, now packed into a pocket card.
Therrien et al. (2005) got restaurant greetings from 6% to 100% with a door chime and quick manager feedback. Both studies show tiny, cheap cues can explode staff skills in real businesses.
Why it matters
You can copy this tomorrow. Pick the three top staff behaviors that matter most. Put them on a wallet card. Ask staff to tally yes/no right after each client contact. No graphs, no money, no extra meetings. Try it for two weeks and watch the numbers move.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Hand your staff a 3-item checklist of key client lines and ask them to score themselves after each session.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Interlocking contingencies that exist between a customer and sales representatives (SRs) may contribute to buying decisions. Verbal behaviors related to closing sales were identified by analyzing these contingencies statistically. Self-observation checklists were then implemented. On average, the six targeted verbal behaviors related to sales increased 12 percentage points over baseline, compared to a 2% point increase in the comparison group. These changes were associated with 126% more sales for the experimental group compared with 36% more sales for the comparison group. For each SR, this increase in sales translates into $1,094,444 more in annualized revenue.
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2018 · doi:10.1080/01608061.2017.1423147