Service Delivery

Experiments in a community mental health center: increasing client payments for outpatient services.

Hannah et al. (1981) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1981
★ The Verdict

Require cash prepayment for the first three visits, then monthly billing—collection soars to 96% without hurting attendance.

✓ Read this if BCBAs managing outpatient mental-health or day-program billing.
✗ Skip if Clinics that already lock in payment through insurance or grants.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team tested a new payment rule at a community mental health center.

Clients had to pay cash for the first three visits. After that, they got a monthly bill.

The researchers used an ABAB design. They turned the rule on and off to see if it worked.

02

What they found

Collection rate jumped from 20% to 96.6%.

Attendance stayed the same. The clinic lost no money and gained steady cash flow.

03

How this fits with other research

Davison et al. (1984) ran a similar reversal study. They gave a small discount for follow-up visits. Both studies show a tiny money tweak lifts compliance without hurting service use.

Winters et al. (2026) tried the opposite move. They paid patients to attend HIV care. Attendance rose while cash flowed, but stopped the moment payments ended. T et al. asked clients to pay up front, and the gain held.

Cordova et al. (1993) mailed reminders and parking passes to pediatric families. Cancellations rose, yet kept appointments did not budge. Their soft cues failed where a firm prepayment rule succeeded.

04

Why it matters

If your clinic fights late or missing fees, try the three-visit cash rule. No extra staff, no gift cards, no forever incentives. You collect almost every dollar and clients still show up. Start Monday: ask new clients to pay at the front desk for visits one, two, and three. Then switch to monthly statements and watch your revenue climb.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Tell new clients the first three sessions are pay-today; swap to monthly invoices after that.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
reversal abab
Population
not specified
Finding
strongly positive
Magnitude
very large

03Original abstract

Although public health care systems often depend on revenue generated from client payment for services, inadequate agency fee payment systems continue to create substantial administrative problems. The first study examined the effects of implementing a system for producing and maintaining routine client fee payment. The second study was a replication of the first study. The Credit Criterion System was designed to: (a) allow clients to establish intra-agency credit by paying cash for each of the first three visits; and (b) pay for services monthly after credit was established. The system resulted in a baseline collection rate of 20%, compared with the Credit Criterion rate of 96.6%. The Credit Criterion System did not create additional administrative costs and it had no effect on attendance. Thus, the Credit Criterion System appears to be a reasonable set of procedures for allowing clients to meet their financial obligations to an agency.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1981 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-141