Employment-based abstinence reinforcement promotes opiate and cocaine abstinence in out-of-treatment injection drug users.
Paychecks tied to clean urines quickly cut opiate and cocaine use in unemployed injection drug users.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team set up a real job site. Adults who used opiates and cocaine could work and get paid. Each paycheck required a drug-free urine test.
They tracked drug tests before and after the work rule began. No clinic visits were needed. The workplace itself became the treatment.
What they found
Clean urines jumped as soon as pay hinged on them. Both opiate and cocaine use dropped sharply. The change was large and immediate.
How this fits with other research
Davidson et al. (2025) pooled many cocaine studies and found the same pattern: money for clean tests beats the odds.
Toegel et al. (2020) used the same job site later. They switched drug targets every two weeks instead of waiting for abstinence. Both methods worked, so you can pick the schedule that fits your crew.
Silverman et al. (2005) first tried the idea online. Pay for data-entry work plus clean tests also cut drug use. The 2014 study moved the model from computer desks to a staffed workplace.
Why it matters
You can pair paychecks with urine screens outside clinics. The job itself keeps people coming back and the money keeps them clean. Try adding a same-day pay rule to your day program or sheltered workshop. One positive test cancels the check—clear, immediate, and fair.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a same-day pay rule: one drug-free urine equals one hour of paid work.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We examined the use of employment-based abstinence reinforcement in out-of-treatment injection drug users, in this secondary analysis of a previously reported trial. Participants (N = 33) could work in the therapeutic workplace, a model employment-based program for drug addiction, for 30 weeks and could earn approximately $10 per hr. During a 4-week induction, participants only had to work to earn pay. After induction, access to the workplace was contingent on enrollment in methadone treatment. After participants met the methadone contingency for 3 weeks, they had to provide opiate-negative urine samples to maintain maximum pay. After participants met those contingencies for 3 weeks, they had to provide opiate- and cocaine-negative urine samples to maintain maximum pay. The percentage of drug-negative urine samples remained stable until the abstinence reinforcement contingency for each drug was applied. The percentage of opiate- and cocaine-negative urine samples increased abruptly and significantly after the opiate- and cocaine-abstinence contingencies, respectively, were applied. These results demonstrate that the sequential administration of employment-based abstinence reinforcement can increase opiate and cocaine abstinence among out-of-treatment injection drug users.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2014 · doi:10.1002/jaba.158