Service Delivery

Differential impact of a multimodal versus pharmacological therapy on the core symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in childhood.

Amado et al. (2016) · Research in developmental disabilities 2016
★ The Verdict

Pairing parent-teacher coaching with stimulant medication turns more kids with ADHD into typical learners than pills alone.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who consult on ADHD treatment teams in schools or clinics
✗ Skip if Practitioners serving only adult clients or non-medicated populations

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Crane et al. (2016) compared two ways to treat ADHD in kids. One group took stimulant medicine only. The other group took medicine plus coaching for parents and teachers.

The study tracked how many children reached normal levels of attention and self-control after treatment.

02

What they found

Both groups got better, but the combo group won. More kids in the medicine-plus-coaching group reached normal symptom levels than kids on pills alone.

The extra coaching helped more children look like their non-ADHD classmates.

03

How this fits with other research

Hake et al. (1983) saw the same boost thirty years earlier. They added self-control lessons to Dexedrine and watched on-task behavior jump higher than meds alone.

AOlsen et al. (2021) zooms in on classroom tactics. They show antecedent tricks help every ADHD student, while reward systems only add extra punch for kids with weak memory or emotional control.

De Meyer et al. (2021) proves fine-tuning rewards can erase learning gaps. Together these papers say: pills set the stage, but smart behavioral extras push more kids to normal.

04

Why it matters

If you write treatment plans, ask the doctor and teacher to join the team. Add brief parent training and simple classroom strategies to the pill plan. The trio gives you the best shot at moving a child from clinical to normal levels in everyday settings.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Schedule a 15-minute chat with the teacher to set up antecedent cues and a daily report card for your medicated client.

02At a glance

Intervention
parent training
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
20
Population
adhd
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to analyze the relative and differential efficacy of a combined versus medical treatment to reduce the symptoms of ADHD children in the school and family environment. A total of 100 subjects participated: 20 children with ADHD, their 40 parents and their 40 teachers. Half of the subjects were assigned to the drug group and half to the combined (drug plus psychosocial, psychoeducational intervention with teachers and mothers/fathers). RESULTS: The group analyses indicated that both treatments were effective, without significant differences between them. Individualized clinical analyses indicated that higher percentages of improvement and normalization were obtained in the children in the combined group than in the drug only group. Our findings point to the desirability of implementing long-lasting multimodal, multicontextual interventions for ADHD in childhood.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2016 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.08.004