Deinstitutionalization at a large facility: a focus on treatment.
Big wards can shut safely when each client gets a personal ABA plan plus daily quality checks.
01Research in Context
What this study did
A large state facility wanted to close and move everyone into the community. Staff wrote a behavioral plan for each resident. They added daily checks to make sure the plans were followed.
The paper tells the story of the change. It does not give numbers or test results.
What they found
The authors say the shift worked. People received personal teaching programs instead of one-size-fits-all routines. Staff kept watching the data and fixed problems quickly.
How this fits with other research
Matson et al. (2004) later showed one man moving from an institution to a real job after a simple DRA-DRO plan. Their single case gives the hard numbers the 1992 story lacks.
Friedman (2021) tested the same idea with adults who have both IDD and mental-health needs. Adding tailored supports raised community success. The 1992 paper planted the seed; Carli grew it into evidence.
Capaldi (1992), written the same year, drew a six-step blueprint for turning any residence into a learning place. Perel (1992) is the field report that proves the blueprint can be lived.
Why it matters
You can copy the game plan: write an ABA curriculum for every person, train all shifts, and run daily fidelity checks. No extra grant needed—just tight teamwork and data. The later studies show the same recipe still works for dual-diagnosis clients and competitive jobs.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one client, write a five-step teaching plan, and add a 5-minute staff check at each shift change.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This paper describes deinstitutionalization efforts at a large facility. The implementation of a behavioral model and development of specific training curricula are described. Emphasis was placed on the design of individualized treatment services. The quality assurance mechanisms utilized included internal monitoring systems as well as evaluations conducted by external agencies. Client treatment programs were geared toward the acquisition of skills necessary for successful community integration. Finally, it is emphasized that clients in all facilities are entitled to effective and appropriate treatment based on their individual needs and not based on client building size.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1992 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(92)90042-5