Service Delivery

Child disability and caregiving in low and middle income countries: Big data approach on open data.

Bizzego et al. (2020) · Research in developmental disabilities 2020
★ The Verdict

In LMICs, kids with ID miss out on brain-building play—boosting caregiver schooling and cutting stigma are powerful levers BCBAs can pull.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running parent-training in low-resource clinics or home programs.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only see high-income, highly educated families.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team scraped open data sets from 36 low- and middle-income countries. They looked at how often caregivers read, counted, or named colors with children who have intellectual disabilities.

They also checked if the caregiver’s own schooling and the country’s wealth changed the picture.

02

What they found

Kids with ID were left out of brain-building play more often than other kids.

The gap shrank when caregivers had more years of school and when the country was richer.

03

How this fits with other research

Feniger-Schaal et al. (2013) showed that moms who accept the ID diagnosis play more gently with their kids. Bizzego et al. (2020) now adds that more school for the parent lowers neglect risk—same family, two sides of one coin.

Werner (2019) found Arab caregivers in Israel use fewer education services even when they like them. The new data widen the lens: across dozens of LMICs, less schooling still predicts less cognitively focused care.

Bruns et al. (2004) warned that poor carer know-how doubles injury risk for people with ID. The 2020 findings echo the call: boost caregiver education and fight stigma to keep kids safe and stimulated.

04

Why it matters

You can’t fix neglect with toys alone. Ask about the caregiver’s own school history and comfort with teaching tasks. Add short modeling sessions—show how to turn laundry into a naming game. Link families to adult-literacy or WhatsApp micro-lessons. Each extra year of parent schooling shown in the data cut the cognitive-care gap. Push for it like it’s part of the behavior plan—because it is.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Open each parent meeting with one question: “What was the last game you played with your child?” Model how to turn that game into a language lesson before you leave.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
29525
Population
intellectual disability, developmental delay, mixed clinical
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of child disabilities might affect the amount of caregiving attention the child receives, with potential ramifications on the development of the child and increasing the likelihood of developing a more severe condition. Little is known about the association between child disabilities and caregiving practices in less developed countries, penalized by both lack of data and a research bias toward western societies. METHOD: In this study, we apply data mining methods on a large (N = 29,525) dataset from UNICEF to investigate the association between caregiving practices and developmental disabilities of the children, and highlight the differences between intellectual and other disabilities. RESULTS: Our results highlight that, compared to other types of disabilities, intellectual disabilities increased the risk of being neglected by the caregiver in those activities oriented to the cognitive development. The education of the caregiver and the socioeconomical development of the country are actively involved in the moderation of the risk. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that educational policies of parental training, such as psychoeducation regarding intellectual disabilities and destigmatization campaigns, are needed to benefit parental practices in low- and middle-income countries.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2020 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103795