Assessing childhood impact: Virtual and in-person counseling for children's language development challenges.
Zoom parent coaching lifts preschool language skills as much as sitting in the clinic.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Alba and her team ran a counseling program for parents of 3- to young learners with language delays. Half the families met the clinician on Zoom; the other half came to the clinic.
Both groups got the same lessons: how to model words, wait for response, and praise tries. Kids were tested before and over the study period.
What they found
Every child gained new words, longer sentences, and clearer speech. The online group improved just as much as the in-person group.
Parents in both settings rated the program equally helpful and doable.
How this fits with other research
Naresh et al. (2020) showed preschoolers talk more when teachers give 100 chances to ask each day. Alba’s study adds that parents can deliver those chances at home, even through a screen.
Michel et al. (2024) found bilingual kids with DLD kept falling behind. Alba’s kids were not bilingual, so the gains here do not clash— they simply apply to a different group.
Ding et al. (2017) already proved teens with IDD will join Zoom workouts. Alba extends that comfort to preschool language lessons.
Why it matters
You can offer parent coaching for language delays without driving families across town. If a family has a tablet and quiet corner, start there. Keep the same goals, model scripts, and data sheets you already use—just hit “record” instead of unlocking the clinic door.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Send one family your usual parent-handout PDF and invite them to a 30-minute Zoom trial session.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
In recent years, family counseling programs have grown significantly. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a counseling program designed for Late Talkers (LT) or children with Development Language Disorder (DLD) aged 3-6. It also seeks to analyze the differences between its implementation in virtual and in-person settings and to gather the opinions of speech therapists and families about the program. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was employed with two groups, each consisting of 17 children, totaling 34 children: one in an in-person setting and the other in a virtual setting. The results reveal significant differences in both approaches, with no relevant disparities between them. The conclusions highlight the program's effectiveness, with benefits in all dimensions. In the in-person modality, proximity to families is emphasized as a primary advantage. In contrast, the virtual modality offers flexibility in terms of intervention schedules and locations but presents technological challenges. Overall, this study supports the effectiveness of both counseling modalities.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2025 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2025.104945