School & Classroom

The impact of teachers' iPad use on supporting functional abilities in children with special needs.

Eden et al. (2025) · Research in developmental disabilities 2025
★ The Verdict

Equip and coach teachers with iPads and kids with mixed disabilities gain language, thinking, and daily-life skills in one school year.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working in public or private special-ed classrooms serving mixed disabilities.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only run 1:1 center-based sessions without teacher contact.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Eden et al. (2025) gave teachers iPads and six months of coaching. They tracked how kids with mixed disabilities progressed in language, thinking, emotions, and daily life skills.

The team used a quasi-experimental design. One group kept usual lessons. The other group got lessons plus teacher iPad use.

02

What they found

Kids in the iPad group gained more skills across every area tested. Language, cognition, emotion, life skills, and overall functioning all moved up.

The gains showed up within one school year. No extra staff were added—just the teacher and the tablet.

03

How this fits with other research

Didden et al. (2009) saw students with epilepsy lose focus across the day. Sigal’s study shows teacher tech can push skills up, not just stop loss.

Syriopoulou-Delli et al. (2012) found trained teachers feel more effective. Sigal adds that when you also give them an iPad, student skills rise, not just teacher confidence.

Paff et al. (2019) built a tool to watch teacher practice. Sigal used a simple pre-post check and still caught real gains, showing you don’t need fancy scoring to see change.

04

Why it matters

You can copy this tomorrow. Hand a teacher an iPad, show three useful apps, and set one skill target per student. Check again in six weeks. If you see even half the gains Sigal found, the device pays for itself.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Load one evidence-based app onto the teacher’s iPad, model it for five minutes, and set a data sheet for the student’s top functional goal.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
998
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

The integration of technology in education has progressed significantly, with iPads becoming a popular tool, particularly in classrooms for children with special needs. This study explores the impact of teachers' pedagogical iPad use on the functional abilities of children with mild-to-severe special needs, focusing on language, cognition, motor, emotional development, and life skills, as well as overall functioning. The study included 1137 participants: 139 teachers (M age = 41.77, SD = 9.78) and 998 children (M age = 9.28, SD = 4.46) with mild-to-severe disabilities. Participants were divided into two groups: (1) an experimental group where teachers used iPads in class (57 teachers; 465 children), and (2) a control group without iPads use (82 teachers; 533 children). Teachers completed six questionnaires at the beginning of the school year, before the experimental group received iPads (T1), and again after an iPad training course and six months of use (T2). Results showed that functional abilities improved significantly across all areas at T2, with greater gains in the experimental group, particularly in language, cognition, emotional, life skills, and general functioning. Multilevel modeling analyses indicated that the time-by-group interactions remained robust even after controlling for teachers' and children's background characteristics. Specific background factors-teachers' years of experience, teachers' iPad use, children's gender, and disability level-also contributed to variations in children's functional levels. The study highlights digital tools' role in bridging educational gaps and fostering equal opportunities for children with special needs.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2025 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105028