School & Classroom

Self-recording of attention versus productivity.

Lloyd et al. (1989) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1989
★ The Verdict

Let upper-elementary special-ed students self-record either attention or productivity—both lift math work and on-task behavior, and kids like attention tracking best.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running academic interventions in late-elementary special-ed classrooms
✗ Skip if Practitioners serving adults in vocational settings

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers compared two self-monitoring tricks in one classroom. Kids tracked either how long they stayed on task or how many math problems they finished. The class swapped methods every few days so each child tried both.

The students were upper-elementary special-education pupils. No diagnosis list was given. The team measured on-task minutes and daily math output for each condition.

02

What they found

Both ways worked. Attention tracking and productivity tracking lifted math work and on-task behavior. Gains showed up on later achievement tests and held weeks later.

When asked, most kids said they liked watching their attention best. Either choice gave teachers a cheap, quick boost with no extra prizes needed.

03

How this fits with other research

Schmitt (1986) ran the same horse-race three years earlier with learning-disabled students and saw mixed results. Productivity monitoring gave a tiny edge in math speed for some kids, but the 1989 study found the two tactics equal. The newer paper adds maintenance and generalization data the first lacked, so it slightly updates the earlier verdict.

Mansell et al. (2002) moved the idea forward into general-ed middle schools. At-risk students self-monitored and grades rose in every class, even ones where no training happened. That shows the trick travels beyond special-ed rooms.

Matson et al. (1989) reviewed adults with developmental disabilities who self-tracked work output. Most studies showed brief productivity jumps, but all-day maintenance was shaky. The classroom kids in W et al. kept gains longer, hinting that child-led monitoring may hold up better than adult vocational programs.

04

Why it matters

You can hand over the clipboard tomorrow. Let the student pick whether to tally ‘Am I paying attention?’ or ‘Did I finish this row?’ Both beat doing nothing, and choice gives buy-in. Start with five-minute intervals and have kids graph their scores at the end of class. No extra tokens needed—self-recording is the reinforcer. Check back in two weeks; you should see more on-task minutes and completed problems, just like the study.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Give your student a choice between two pocket-sized tally cards—one for ‘on-task’ checks, one for ‘problems done’—and run a five-minute self-count today.

02At a glance

Intervention
self management
Design
alternating treatments
Sample size
5
Population
not specified
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

We investigated the relative effects of self-recording of attentive behavior and self-recording of academic productivity with 5 upper elementary-aged special education students in their special education classroom. Following baseline, both self-recording treatments were introduced according to a multielement design. After the multielement phase, we assessed the pupils' performance under a choice condition, faded the overt aspects of the treatment program according to a withdrawal design, and probed maintenance over 5 weeks. Results revealed that both treatments produced clear improvements in arithmetic productivity and attention to task, neither treatment was clearly and consistently superior to the other, pupils preferred the self-recording of attention treatment, the effects were maintained for all pupils, achievement test scores improved, and pupils generally recorded accurately.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1989 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1989.22-315