School & Classroom

Peer tutoring among elementary students: educational benefits to the tutor.

Dineen et al. (1977) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1977
★ The Verdict

Letting kids teach spelling to peers lifts the tutor’s scores as much as the tutee’s.

✓ Read this if BCBAs helping teachers in K-3 general-ed classrooms.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve individual learners with intensive needs.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Three typical second-graders took turns teaching spelling words to classmates.

Each child served as tutor one day and tutee the next.

The class used simple flash-card drills and praise for correct answers.

02

What they found

The kids learned spelling words just as well when they taught as when they were taught.

Words that never appeared in either role stayed misspelled, so the practice mattered.

03

How this fits with other research

Paul et al. (1987) later repeated the idea with 211 first- and second-graders and still saw the same boost, showing the 1977 result holds in large classrooms.

Morgan et al. (2020) moved the same logic down to preschool and switched the goal to naming objects. Again, both tutor and tutee gained new words.

Adkins et al. (1997) kept the peer-teaching setup but aimed at social skills for classmates with autism. Social bids rose for the autistic students, proving the tutor format stretches beyond spelling.

04

Why it matters

You can raise academic scores without adding staff. Pick a peer, hand over flash cards, and let the class run itself for ten minutes. Rotate pairs daily so every student gets a turn to teach. You will see spelling gains in the tutors while you free up time to collect data or give extra help elsewhere.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pair students, give the tutor a pack of spelling cards, and set a five-minute timer for daily reciprocal drills.

02At a glance

Intervention
direct instruction
Design
alternating treatments
Sample size
3
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

To determine whether tutoring might be academically beneficial to the tutor, this study investigated the acquisition of spelling words by three elementary students in a peer tutoring program. The experimental design allowed a simultaneous comparison of each child's gain in performance on comparable word lists on which the child tutored another child, was tutored by another child, or neither gave nor received tutoring. The children's spelling improved nearly an equivalent amount on those words on which they tutored another child as on the words on which they were tutored; no such change was noted on the words on which they neither gave nor received tutoring. These findings, that peer tutoring is profitable for the tutor as well as the tutee, provide a basis for recommending peer tutoring as one method of individualizing education.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-231