Peer tutoring among elementary students: educational benefits to the tutor.
Letting kids teach spelling to peers lifts the tutor’s scores as much as the tutee’s.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three typical second-graders took turns teaching spelling words to classmates.
Each child served as tutor one day and tutee the next.
The class used simple flash-card drills and praise for correct answers.
What they found
The kids learned spelling words just as well when they taught as when they were taught.
Words that never appeared in either role stayed misspelled, so the practice mattered.
How this fits with other research
Paul et al. (1987) later repeated the idea with 211 first- and second-graders and still saw the same boost, showing the 1977 result holds in large classrooms.
Morgan et al. (2020) moved the same logic down to preschool and switched the goal to naming objects. Again, both tutor and tutee gained new words.
Adkins et al. (1997) kept the peer-teaching setup but aimed at social skills for classmates with autism. Social bids rose for the autistic students, proving the tutor format stretches beyond spelling.
Why it matters
You can raise academic scores without adding staff. Pick a peer, hand over flash cards, and let the class run itself for ten minutes. Rotate pairs daily so every student gets a turn to teach. You will see spelling gains in the tutors while you free up time to collect data or give extra help elsewhere.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pair students, give the tutor a pack of spelling cards, and set a five-minute timer for daily reciprocal drills.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
To determine whether tutoring might be academically beneficial to the tutor, this study investigated the acquisition of spelling words by three elementary students in a peer tutoring program. The experimental design allowed a simultaneous comparison of each child's gain in performance on comparable word lists on which the child tutored another child, was tutored by another child, or neither gave nor received tutoring. The children's spelling improved nearly an equivalent amount on those words on which they tutored another child as on the words on which they were tutored; no such change was noted on the words on which they neither gave nor received tutoring. These findings, that peer tutoring is profitable for the tutor as well as the tutee, provide a basis for recommending peer tutoring as one method of individualizing education.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-231