Peer intervention effects on communicative interaction among handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers.
Train preschool peers to give simple play prompts and children with language delays keep talking more even after you stop.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Collier et al. (1986) worked with three preschoolers who had language delays. The kids were in a classroom with typical peers.
The researchers taught the typical peers to give simple prompts like "Ask me to play." They measured how often the language-delayed children talked or gestured during free play.
What they found
When peers prompted, all three children with language delays started more conversations. After the prompts stopped, the higher talking rates stayed up.
In short: peer nudges worked and the gains stuck.
How this fits with other research
Fingeret et al. (1985) tried a similar idea one year earlier. They added teacher prompts and small prizes. Their gains faded when the teacher stopped cueing, while H et al. kept gains without extra help.
Laermans et al. (2025) later bundled peer prompts into a teacher-run "Stay Play Talk" package for autistic preschoolers. Their package also kept gains, showing the field moved from simple peer prompts to full teacher-friendly kits.
Strain et al. (1977) first showed that peer initiations help withdrawn kids. H et al. narrowed the focus to communication and proved the effect lasts after you pull the prompts.
Why it matters
You can teach classmates to give quick communication prompts during play. The child with delays talks more, and you do not need to keep prompting forever. Try it at centers or recess: train two peers, watch for five minutes, then step back.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick two typical peers, teach them to say "Ask me to play" at the block center, and count the child's communication acts for ten minutes.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A peer-mediated intervention designed to promote communicative interaction on the part of three language-delayed children was evaluated. Two nonhandicapped preschoolers were taught strategies thought to facilitate interaction and were prompted to use these strategies during free play with three handicapped classmates. The intervention resulted in higher rates of interaction for each of the handicapped children that persisted above baseline levels after teacher prompting was withdrawn.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1986 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1986.19-209