Assisting children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder to reduce the hyperactive behavior of arbitrary standing in class with a Nintendo Wii remote controller through an active reminder and preferred reward stimulation.
A hip-buzz from a Wii Remote plus instant tiny rewards let two kids with ADHD stay seated all class.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Two elementary students with ADHD kept popping out of their seats. The teacher clipped a Wii Remote to each child’s belt. A tilt sensor inside the remote felt when the child stood up. The remote buzzed the child’s hip for one second. If the child sat back down within five seconds, the teacher handed over a small, chosen reward—stickers, a mini-car, or a sip of juice. The team tracked standing episodes across math, Chinese, and art lessons. They used a multiple-baseline design across the two kids.
Baseline lasted until each child showed stable, high rates of standing. Then the buzz-plus-reward package started for the first child while the second stayed in baseline. After clear drops, the second child got the same package.
What they found
Both students dropped from about 8–10 random stands per 50-minute lesson to almost zero. Gains held when the teacher later removed the reward but kept the buzz reminder. One month later, each child still sat through most of the lesson. Teachers said lessons flowed without the usual stop-and-walk interruptions.
The Wii buzz worked like a silent, private cue. Kids did not feel singled out in front of peers.
How this fits with other research
Shih et al. (2011) used Wii Balance Boards three years earlier. Their clients with developmental disabilities earned music or lights by stepping on the board. Both studies turn Nintendo toys into assistive tech, but the 2014 paper shifts the goal from earning fun to stopping hyperactive movement.
Tonnsen et al. (2016) cut disruptive talking in kindergarten with the Color Wheel class-wide system. Both teams reached near-zero problem behavior in general-ed rooms, showing that simple antecedent packages can beat heavy punishment.
Dukhayyil et al. (1973) warned that self-evaluation alone failed for teens; tokens had to stay teacher-controlled. The 2014 study keeps the teacher in charge of reward delivery, matching that old lesson: external reinforcement first, self-management later.
Why it matters
You can strap any cheap tilt sensor to a belt and pair it with a five-second rule. No extra staff, no loud clickers, no pills. Pick a reward the child already wants, deliver it right after the hips touch the chair, and fade the reward once sitting turns into habit. Try it next week with a fitness tracker or even a smart-phone set to vibrate—same idea, same quick win.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Tape a buzzer to the child’s waistband, give a sticker every time they sit within five seconds of the buzz, and graph stands per period.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Recent studies in the field of special education have shown that in combination with software technology, high-tech commercial products can be applied as useful assistive technology devices to help people with disabilities. This study extended this concept to turn a Nintendo Wii Remote Controller into a high-performance limb action detector, in order to evaluate whether two students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) could reduce their hyperactive behavior through an active reminder and stimulation in the form of the participants' preferred rewards. This study focused on one particular hyperactive behavior common to both students: standing up arbitrarily during class. The active reminder was in the form of vibration feedback provided via the built-in function of the Wii Remote Controller, which was controlled and triggered by a control system to remind participants when they were engaging in standing behavior. This study was performed according to a multiple baseline design across participants. The results showed that both participants significantly improved their control over their hyperactive behavior during the intervention phase, and retained this effective performance in the maintenance phase. The practical and developmental implications of the findings are discussed.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2014 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.007