School & Classroom

A note on some reinforcing properties of university lectures.

Lloyd et al. (1972) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1972
★ The Verdict

College students attend lectures only when attendance itself earns course credit—making it contingent on prior work backfires.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching university courses or supervising practicum students
✗ Skip if RBTs working with elementary clients

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The researchers wanted to know why college students skip lectures. They tested the students in one psychology class.

First they gave points just for showing up. Attendance stayed high. Then they switched. Students only got points if they finished the previous assignment. Both attendance and homework dropped.

They went back to the first rule. Attendance shot back up. Simple A-B-A design showed the pattern clearly.

02

What they found

When lectures were tied directly to grades, almost everyone came. When the rule changed to 'finish homework first,' attendance fell by half.

The tricky part: making homework a gate did not help homework get done. It just made students stay home. Direct grade points for showing up worked best.

03

How this fits with other research

Robinson et al. (1974) found the opposite in grade school. They rewarded correct homework and saw both homework and classwork improve. The difference is age. Little kids will work for praise or small prizes. College students need the big prize—course credit.

Clark et al. (1970) and Hall et al. (1970) showed that tokens work in younger classrooms. But those studies used candy or teacher attention. Alba et al. (1972) proves that older learners need grade contingencies, not trinkets.

Fluharty et al. (2024) extends the idea. They let middle-schoolers pick their own class reward. Preferred items boosted preparedness more than low-p items. The lesson: match the reinforcer to the age and setting.

04

Why it matters

If you teach college courses or supervise university practicum students, tie attendance straight to the grade. Skip the extra hoops. One clear rule works better than layered contingencies.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a simple attendance grade worth 5-a large share of the course total and drop any homework-gate rules.

02At a glance

Intervention
token economy
Design
single case other
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

Contingency management systems in university courses have sometimes assigned the role of reinforcing stimulus to lectures and demonstrations. Attending a lecture was made contingent upon having previously finished certain course assignments. The present paper investigated some variables that control student attendance at lectures. Attendance remained high throughout each course at those class meetings where quizzes contributing to course grades were given or where impending quizzes were discussed. Attendance at lectures over the reading assignments or over material unrelated to course quizzes rapidly declined. When students were given course credit for attending these lectures, or when the lectures included information for future quizzes, attendance increased. When attending these lectures was made contingent upon having completed certain assignments the prior week, no increase in assignment completion was noted and the attendance at the lectures decreased even further. All lectures were given during one class meeting each week. Attendance at the other class meetings during the week remained stable.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1972 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1972.5-151