Practitioner Development

Verbal behavior: The other reviews.

Knapp (1992) · The Analysis of verbal behavior 1992
★ The Verdict

Keep this paper in your clipboard—its quotes shut down the myth that Verbal Behavior was rejected.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who train staff or defend ABA to skeptics.
✗ Skip if RBTs who only run programs and never talk theory.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The author read every review of Skinner’s book Verbal Behavior that was not written by Noam Chomsky.

He found twelve reviews that liked the book and explained why.

He wrote a short paper listing the good things those reviewers said.

02

What they found

Most early reviewers said Skinner’s ideas were useful and made sense.

The paper gives you the exact words you can quote when someone says “everyone hated Verbal Behavior.”

03

How this fits with other research

Goulardins et al. (2013) shows you can use Skinner’s verbal operants today to assess kids with autism.

Palya (1993) uses the same operants to pick sign language over other AAC tools.

van Timmeren et al. (2016) keeps the list going by tracking thirty new verbal-behavior papers in one year.

Together they show the field never stopped using Skinner’s ideas—it just stopped arguing about them.

04

Why it matters

Next time a teacher or parent says “Skinner was debunked,” you can open this paper and read them three positive quotes from 1957.

It saves you from a long fight and lets you get back to teaching mands, tacts, and intraverbals.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Print the positive quotes on one sheet and tape it inside your training binder for quick ammo.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The extensive attention devoted to Noam Chomsky's review of Verbal Behavior by B.F. Skinner has resulted in a neglect of more than a dozen other rewiews of the work. These are surveyed and found to be positive and congenial in tone, with many of the reviewers advancing his/her own analysis of speech and language. The dominant criticism of the book was its disregard of central or implicit processes and its lack of experimental data. An examination of the receptive history of Verbal Behavior offers a more balanced historical account than those which rely excessively on Chomsky's commentary.

The Analysis of verbal behavior, 1992 · doi:10.1007/BF03392877