Using a Checklist to Increase Objective Session Note Writing: Preliminary Results
A short checklist boosts some note details but can miss problem behavior unless you add feedback.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Luna et al. (2019) gave staff a one-page checklist for writing session notes. The list reminded writers to include reinforcers, prompts, and problem behavior.
Workers first took a short training. Then they wrote notes with the checklist beside them. The team later scored the notes for objective details.
What they found
Notes got better at naming reinforcers and prompts. Descriptions of problem behavior, however, became slightly less accurate.
The mixed result shows a checklist can sharpen some facts while dulling others.
How this fits with other research
Brown et al. (2021) extended this idea. They added a sample note, self-monitoring, and feedback. Their package pushed six technicians to complete every field and kept the gains for two weeks.
Petscher et al. (2006) foreshadowed the checklist approach. They paired brief training with self-monitoring to keep classroom aides running token economies correctly.
Shabani et al. (2006) used supervisor feedback instead of a checklist. Both studies raised staff data quality, but feedback held up after the supervisor left while the checklist did not fix every error.
Why it matters
If you just need more reinforcer and prompt details, print the Luna checklist and tape it to each clipboard. If you also want accuracy on problem behavior, layer in a quick supervisor check or peer review like Brown and B et al. did. Pick the lightest tool that gives you clean data without extra meeting time.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add the Luna checklist to your note template and schedule one spot-check per week for problem-behavior accuracy.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We evaluated the extent to which a checklist increased objective note writing following simulated teaching sessions for 17 special education staff members. In general, participants improved in their description of the reinforcer earned by the child and of prompts delivered by the teacher during a session. Nevertheless, participants’ correct reporting of problem behavior decreased following the training.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2019 · doi:10.1007/s40617-018-00315-4