The early research of John B. Watson: Before the behavioral revolution.
Watson was already a data nerd before 1913, so keep your own charts just as ruthless.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Thompson et al. (1986) dug through Watson’s lab notebooks and early papers.
They showed that before his famous 1913 manifesto, Watson was already running tight, number-heavy animal experiments on vision, hearing, and learning.
The review covers rats, birds, and humans—charting how Watson counted every response long before he shouted “behaviorism.”
What they found
The myth is wrong: Watson did not suddenly turn objective in 1913.
His 1903-1912 work is full of cumulative graphs, control groups, and calibrated stimuli—exactly the tools we still praise today.
How this fits with other research
Leung et al. (2014) extends this story. They look at Watson’s 1924 book and find the same data-first attitude, proving the thread runs past 1913.
Fournier et al. (2004) and Thompson et al. (1986) both use archival digging. One shows “cumulative record” existed before Skinner; the other shows objective graphs existed before Watson’s manifesto. Together they warn us: credit the work, not the legend.
Imam (2021) agrees on method. Watson’s early numbers and Sidman’s later visual analysis both skip NHST traps. Same escape route, different decades.
Why it matters
Next time you train staff, skip the “Watson only cared about S-R” slide. Show his 1908 rat maze graphs instead. It reminds RBTs that precise measurement is the root of our field, not a modern add-on. Keep graphs, counts, and clear visuals at the center of every session—that is the true Watson legacy you can use on Monday.
Get CEUs on This Topic — Free
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Open a 2003-style cumulative graph and review last week’s client data with your team—no stats software, just visual analysis.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
John B. Watson is widely regarded as one of the most important figures in modern psychology. Despite this stature, however, presentations of his contributions and career are usually limited to material on his establishment of classical behaviorism in 1913, and then on subsequent elaborations of his position and on his study of conditioned emotional reactions. Watson's career and research prior to 1913 are rarely mentioned or cited; moreover, when this work is mentioned, the presentations often contain errors of fact. To correct these shortcomings, we present an overview of his pre-1913 research that focuses on (1) his doctoral thesis and first book, Animal Education; (2) his studies with Harvey Carr on the role of the various sense modalities in rats' maze learning; (3) his collaboration with Robert Yerkes on the design and construction of psychophysical equipment for the quantitative study of vision, and on experiments on the visual capabilities of monkeys, rabbits, rats, and birds; and (4) his extensive naturalistic studies in Florida on the behavior of noddy and sooty terns, parts of which anticipated better-known subsequent research on imprinting and instinctual drift. Watson's commitment to the development of an objective, natural science of behavior is clearly evident throughout his early research. In addition, his research shows that his range of interests and scientific sophistication are greater than typical descriptions of his work indicate.
The Behavior analyst, 1986 · doi:10.1007/BF03391931