Teaching trainees to implement functional communication training with multiple schedules: An evaluation of training effects and durability
Plan a booster session up front or staff will lose 20-30 % fidelity when the caseload changes.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Six new staff learned how to run FCT with multiple schedules. Trainers used BST: short demo, practice with feedback, and a quick quiz.
After each trainee hit 90 % correct across two mock sessions, the team waited. They later threw in 'durability checks'—new client, new script, or new room—to see if skills stuck.
What they found
All six reached mastery in under four hours of training. Good news: BST worked fast.
Bad news: four of them slipped below 80 % when the check came. One booster session or just more real-world exposure put them back over 90 %.
How this fits with other research
Courtemanche et al. (2021) already showed you can train 18 people at once. Yassa keeps the group idea but adds planned booster shots when the case changes.
Jenkins et al. (2016) said one rehearsal is enough for FA tasks. Yassa agrees for first-time mastery, but shows extra reps later are needed to keep FCT-with-multiple-schedules sharp.
Conine et al. (2025) found caregiver BST fades without ongoing support. The same rule applies to staff: schedule the follow-up or fidelity drops.
Why it matters
Write a booster date on the calendar the day you finish BST. When a new client arrives, or the schedule shifts, run a ten-minute refresher. That tiny step prevents the 60 % drop Yassa saw and keeps FCT strong.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a five-minute fidelity check and mini-rehearsal to your next team meeting.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We evaluated the effects of behavioral skills training on improving participant implementation of functional communication training with multiple schedules when working with a confederate. Behavioral skills training produced mastery-level responding for all six participants who required training, providing the first empirically supported training for this functional communication training approach. Next, we assessed durability during training challenges with (a) procedural changes to the original protocol, (b) a novel confederate with different discriminative stimuli and reinforcers, and (c) relapsed confederate destructive behavior. Training effects degraded at least once for all participants and in 62% of training challenges, although continuing to expose the participant to the challenging situations or providing post-session booster training resolved the degradation in most cases. We discuss these findings in relation to their clinical implications and directions for future research.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2024 · doi:10.1002/jaba.2915