Pyramidal training: a large-scale application with institutional staff.
Train supervisors first—pyramidal BST plus daily feedback quickly upskills 45 institutional staff and modestly boosts resident responding.
01Research in Context
What this study did
McGonigle et al. (1982) ran a big pyramidal BST project in a state facility. They trained supervisors first, then those supervisors trained 45 direct-care staff.
Every day the supervisors gave brief feedback to their teams. The researchers tracked how well staff used correct teaching moves and how much residents responded.
What they found
Staff teaching behaviors rose after the training package. Resident responding also improved, but only a little.
Skills did not spread to new lesson topics. Staff needed more help to use what they learned in different subjects.
How this fits with other research
Courtemanche et al. (2021) later topped these results. They trained 36 staff at once and hit 85-100 % accuracy, beating the medium gains seen here.
Kamana et al. (2024) moved the same model into community IDD homes. BST plus on-the-job feedback still worked despite high staff turnover.
Ólafsdóttir et al. (2026) kept the pyramidal logic but switched the skill to FCT. Trainer accuracy dipped after a month, then bounced back with quick booster sessions.
Why it matters
If you run a large program, train your supervisors first and give them a daily feedback script. You can reach dozens of staff without hiring outside trainers. Just watch for skill drift and plan brief booster checks, especially when routines or clients change.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one skill, script a 2-minute feedback form, and have each supervisor give it to their team after the next session.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study evaluated an indirect method of training 45 institutional direct care staff to conduct behavioral programs. Three supervisors were trained to improve teaching behaviors (instructions, prompts, and consequence) used by the direct care staff while working with severely and profoundly handicapped residents. In addition to training, daily feedback was provided to supervisors regarding performance of their staff. Results of a multiple baseline analysis across teaching behaviors (instructions, prompts, and consequences) and content areas (communication and gross motor skills) showed that providing training and feedback to supervisors resulted in increases in correct teaching behavior by direct care staff. However, teaching behavior newly learned in one content area (communication) did not generalize to the other area (gross motor skills). Data collected on resident behavior showed small but noticeable improvement in terms of correct responses and attending behavior during programming. Results are discussed in terms of the benefits of a pyramidal approach to training institutional staff.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1982 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-335