Stop Preaching to the Choir, Publish Outside the Box: A Discussion.
Learn to rewrite your work for non-ABA editors and you can push behavior analysis into mainstream circles.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Morris (2014) wrote a how-to guide for behavior analysts who want to publish in non-ABA journals. The paper lists practical tips for talking with editors who have never heard of Skinner.
It is not a study with participants. It is a discussion paper that gives step-by-step advice on rewriting jargon so outsiders can understand.
What they found
The paper finds that our field stays small because we only talk to each other. If we learn to translate our work, we can reach teachers, doctors, and policy makers.
No numbers are reported. The message is simple: change your writing style, grow your audience.
How this fits with other research
Crosbie (1993) said the same thing twenty years earlier: stop talking only to ourselves. Morris (2014) turns that old warning into a concrete writing checklist.
Lerman (2024) takes the idea further. Instead of just writing articles, she gives a blueprint for training packages you can hand straight to teachers or nurses.
Critchfield et al. (2023) show the payoff. They use altmetrics to prove that articles in Behavior Analysis in Practice are already being read by outsiders, giving you a way to track your own outreach.
Why it matters
If you want your parent training or toilet-study to help more than a handful of BCBAs, pitch it to a pediatric or education journal. Swap "response cost" for "fine," add a plain-language summary, and cite journals those editors already know. One published piece in a mainstream outlet can shape policy faster than ten in specialized titles.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Take your last case study, replace every bit of jargon with a fifth-grade word, and test it on a friend who is not in ABA.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
In this article, I comment on Normand's, Vyse's, Friman's, Schlinger's, and Reed's articles on publishing books, journal articles, letters to the editor, and columns outside of behavior analysis, that is, "outside the box," as well as communicating with editors, authors, and journalists. Among the topics I address are the prerequisite repertoires and these authors' guidance (e.g., task analyses), as well as technical terms and language and the many opportunities available to us, yet also caveats about how, whether, and when we should publish outside the box. In the process, I include lessons I have learned from submitting my own manuscripts outside the box and suggestions I have gleaned from my failures and successes. In conclusion, if the field values publishing outside the box, then, it should analyze the necessary repertoires and provide systematic instruction in them.
The Behavior analyst, 2014 · doi:10.1080/00223980.1936.9917445