Research Productivity Among Practitioners in Behavior Analysis: Recommendations from the Prolific.
Track one client dataset, pick a high-visibility journal, and you can publish without extra funding.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors looked at who publishes in behavior analysis and how often. They wrote a narrative review that pulls together earlier numbers on practitioner research. The goal was to spot simple habits that help everyday BCBAs turn casework into papers.
What they found
Busy clinicians can still publish if they track data while they work. Team up with nearby professors. Aim for journals that reach the readers you want. These three moves raise output without extra grant money.
How this fits with other research
Morris et al. (2022) extends these tips to teaching colleges. They show how small grants and course-embedded studies keep research alive under heavy teaching loads.
Friman (2014) and Normand (2014) push the same idea further: send your paper to pediatric or other mainstream journals. This widens impact and boosts citations, matching the 2015 call to pick high-yield outlets.
Weinsztok et al. (2025) adds a new tool. They give a 10-step checklist for writing systematic reviews. A BCBA can now choose: write a quick data paper per Kocher et al. (2015) or run a review per Weinsztok et al. (2025) to stay active.
Why it matters
You do not need a lab or big grant to add to the literature. Start by logging one client dataset this week. Pick a journal outside our usual box, like a pediatric or public-health outlet, to reach more readers. Use the new systematic-review checklist when you lack raw data. These small shifts turn daily practice into publishable work and lift the whole field’s visibility.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Open an Excel sheet and log today’s client data with date, target, and outcome columns.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The field of behavior analysis has matured to the point that there are now over a dozen peerreviewed journals devoted exclusively to its content. Consequently, researchers have published with increasing frequency a number of bibliometric analyses in which journal content has been quantified and used as an index of research and publication practices in the field. Topics of bibliometric analyses of the behavioral literature include journal citation trends (Carr & Britton, 2003), assessment practices (Gresham, Gansle, & Noell, 1993), and general characteristics of applied behavior-analytic research (Northup, Vollmer, & Serrett, 1993), among others.
Behavior analysis in practice, 2015 · doi:10.1037/h0100035