Preference assessment training via self-instruction: A replication and extension

Shapiro et al. (2016) built a self-instruction manual for paired-stimulus preference assessments.

Staff read the packet, then tried the assessment with a learner. A supervisor gave a short feedback list to anyone who missed steps.

The team used a multiple-baseline design across participants to see if the package worked.

Most staff hit 100% fidelity after the manual alone.

The few who needed help got there after one quick feedback sheet.

Everyone kept the skill the next week.

Izquierdo-Gomez et al. (2015) did something close one year earlier. They used a short video with embedded prompts instead of a paper manual. Both studies reached mastery, so you can pick the medium your staff like best.

Ruppel et al. (2023) took the same idea online. They replaced the paper manual with emailed slides and gave live Zoom feedback. Staff still hit 90% plus fidelity, showing the package moves well to telehealth.

Ausenhus et al. (2019) added real-time coaching through a webcam. That extra layer may help if staff struggle after the paper or video route.

You now have a menu: paper, video, or Zoom. Start with the cheapest manual. If scores are clean, you are done. If not, add one round of feedback or switch to live coaching. Either way you protect client time and agency money while keeping assessment quality high.