Research Cluster

ABA Journal Roots and Mission

This cluster tells the story of the three big ABA journals and why they were started. It shows how JABA, JEAB, and AJIDD welcome certain kinds of studies and what they want authors to do. A BCBA can learn where to send their work and how each journal helps the field grow. Knowing the journals’ goals helps practitioners pick the right place to share new ideas.

53articles
1973–2026year range
5key findings
Key Findings

What 53 articles tell us

  1. Editorial boards in behavior-analytic journals have historically been U.S.-centric and male-dominated at top levels, though gender diversity among board members is improving.
  2. Good peer review in behavior-analytic journals prioritizes scientific merit and topic expertise over copyediting, and requires a respectful, constructive tone.
  3. Reviewer mentoring programs at behavior-analytic journals can improve review quality and address global imbalances in who carries the peer review workload.
  4. JACMP now offers twelve distinct article types with stricter peer-review timelines and explicit rules about AI use in the review process.
  5. Embedding equity-focused practices, such as diversifying research partnerships with people with IDD, is a role that journal editors can take on directly.
Free CEUs

Get 60+ CEUs Free in The ABA Clubhouse

Live CEU every Wednesday — ethics, supervision, and clinical topics. Always free.

Join Free →

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions from BCBAs and RBTs

JABA focuses on applied behavior analysis with socially significant outcomes. JEAB publishes experimental basic research on behavior. AJIDD is an interdisciplinary journal covering intellectual and developmental disabilities broadly.

Most journals accept reviewer applications or invitations. Establish expertise in a topic area, read the reviewer guidelines for your target journal, and reach out to an editor. Reviewer mentoring programs are also available at some journals.

Research says editors prioritize topic expertise, careful evaluation of study design and data interpretation, a constructive and respectful tone, and relevance to the journal's audience. Copyediting is a lower priority.

Editorial decisions shape what research gets published and cited. Boards that lack geographic and demographic diversity may systematically under-publish work from underrepresented communities and regions.

Have them read with the journal's mission in mind, practice structured critique using a consistent framework, and compare how the same topic is covered in different venues. This builds the kind of critical reading that translates into better practice decisions.