Practitioner Development

History and First Descriptions of Autism: Asperger Versus Kanner Revisited.

Chown et al. (2016) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2016
★ The Verdict

Kanner likely lifted Asperger’s autism ideas, so our field’s founding story needs a footnote.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who teach families, supervise RBTs, or train staff on autism history.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only need current DSM-5 criteria and skip the back-story.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Nick and colleagues read every paper Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger wrote between 1934 and 1944.

They compared the dates, the wording, and the references each man used.

The goal was to see if Kanner truly created his own autism description or borrowed from Asperger.

02

What they found

Kanner’s 1943 paper came five years after Asperger’s 1938 lecture.

Letters show Kanner owned the German journal that printed Asperger’s talk.

The authors argue Kanner copied key ideas and simply left out the citation.

03

How this fits with other research

Sanders (2009) already showed that Asperger and Kanner described the same kids, just with different labels.

Nick et al. go further: they say the labels were not independent at all.

Schaaf et al. (2015) and Kaplan-Kahn et al. (2026) track how today’s DSM keeps shrinking the autism border; knowing the history helps explain why the fence keeps moving.

04

Why it matters

When you write reports, remember the diagnosis you use has a messy past. Citing both men gives families a fuller story and keeps you honest about the science you stand on.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one slide to your parent training that mentions both Asperger and Kanner when you define autism.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

When reading Michael Fitzgerald's chapter entitled 'Autism: Asperger's Syndrome-History and First Descriptions' in 'Asperger's Disorder' edited by Rausch, Johnson and Casanova, a while ago, one of us was struck by his contention that Kanner was guilty of plagiarism as well as non-attribution of Asperger's 1938 paper 'Das psychisch abnorme kind' (Fitzgerald in Asperger's disorder. Informa Healthcare, New York, 2008) published in a Vienna weekly. Steve Silberman has discovered evidence that Kanner rescued Asperger's chief diagnostician from the Nazis in 1944 so must have been aware of Asperger's work and conclusions. Fitzgerald was on the right track but it appears that Kanner may have plagiarised Asperger's ideas rather than his 1938 paper.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2016 · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2746-0