From technical jargon to plain English for application.

Bauman (1991) wrote a how-to guide for BCBAs. The paper lists common ABA terms and gives plain-English swaps.

Instead of saying "conditioned reinforcement," the author says "reward that works because of learning." The goal is to help staff and parents grasp what we do.

The paper finds that simple words build trust. When teams talk in everyday language, clients stick with treatment longer.

The author warns that good translations take time and field testing. A fast switch can lose meaning.

Kornack et al. (2019) extends this idea to families who speak little English. They say plain words are not enough; you also need an interpreter or translated forms to obey ACA rules.

Finucane et al. (2023) seems to push the other way. They tell us to keep DSM-5 terms like "autism spectrum disorder" in reports so science stays exact. The two papers look opposite, but they serve different jobs. Bauman (1991) guides how you talk in the room. Brenda et al. guide how you write for other pros.

Wolfensberger (2011) joins Bauman (1991) in doubting forced "people-first" rules. Both say use the words your listener already knows and trusts.

Next time you explain a plan, swap the jargon. Say "we teach him to ask for breaks" instead of "we reinforce manding for escape.” Parents nod faster, and staff make fewer errors. Keep the big words for your notes—clarity in the room, precision on the page.