Effectiveness of immediate verbal feedback on trainer behaviour during communication training with individuals with intellectual disability.
A 30-second spoken correction during the session lifts trainer accuracy and the gains stick.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors watched university trainers teach communication skills to adults with intellectual disability.
When a trainer skipped a prompt or gave the reinforcer late, the supervisor gave a quick verbal correction within the session.
They tracked how many teaching steps each trainer got right before, during, and after the feedback.
What they found
The 30-second corrections lifted trainer accuracy right away.
Good scores stayed high weeks later with no extra coaching.
How this fits with other research
Aznar et al. (2005) ran the same idea in special-ed classrooms. Teachers got feedback every two weeks and their behavior-plan fidelity doubled. The two studies line up: brief feedback keeps adults sharp.
Keintz et al. (2011) swapped spoken words for video clips. Caregivers of clients with visual and intellectual disabilities watched tapes and improved their responses to client cues. Video works too, but it takes longer than the 30-second talk used here.
Sobsey et al. (1983) did the opposite schedule. Parents got a one-hour booster with graphed feedback after skills had already dropped. The session brought their accuracy back. Lattal (2004) shows you can skip the big booster if you give tiny fixes all along.
Why it matters
You do not need long meetings or piles of graphs. A quiet word right after the error keeps trainers accurate and saves client learning time. Try one spoken reminder next session and watch the teaching steps line up.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one trainer, count prompt order and reinforcer timing for 10 trials, then give one quick verbal fix for any miss.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The effect of immediate verbal feedback on trainer behaviour during communication training sessions with individuals with intellectual disability (ID) was assessed. Trainers were six undergraduate university students majoring in psychology. The procedure consisted of interrupting the sequence of trials of training by the supervisor and then giving brief corrective feedback. Feedback was focused on the accuracy of the following procedural aspects: (1) entry behaviour; (2) prompt level and order of presenting response prompts; (3) use of reinforcement; (4) pace of presenting trials; and (5) if this occurred, handling trainee's disruptive behaviour during training. Data were collected in a nonconcurrent multiple baseline design. Results indicated a statistically significant increase of the percentage correct trainer behaviour as compared to the baseline phase. Maintenance of effect of feedback was recorded during post-training and follow-up.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2004 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00555.x