Applied behavior analysis: its impact on the treatment of mentally retarded emotionally disturbed people.
Early ABA principles opened the door to treating people with both ID and emotional disorders, and today’s gaps echo the same need for tougher science.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Koegel et al. (1992) traced how early lab work in ABA moved into real-world care.
They looked at people who had both intellectual disability and serious emotional problems.
The paper is a story-style review, not a new experiment.
What they found
The authors showed that first-generation ABA tactics became self-help and mental-health tools.
No new numbers were given; the piece is a historical map.
How this fits with other research
Fantino (1981) told the same spread story a decade earlier, but for all fields, not just ID.
Rasing et al. (1992) extends the idea into classrooms the very same year.
Gitimoghaddam et al. (2022) later scooped 770 studies and found big gaps—only 4% had control groups—showing the field still leans on the early faith L et al. described.
Why it matters
If you serve adults or youth with dual diagnosis, this paper reminds you that today’s tools stand on 1990s shoulders. Use it to explain to teams why we keep data, break skills down, and pair respect with science.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pull one self-help skill from your client’s plan, chart it daily this week, and share the trend with staff—just like the pioneers did.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Laboratory research on behavior analysis proved to be useful in establishing principles of learning with many relevant applications for people. Early efforts in the applied behavior analysis area proved to be particularly successful with mentally retarded persons. Self-help skills received much of the earliest attention, but another area that became quite fruitful for study was dual diagnosis--mental health problems of mentally retarded individuals. This paper reviews some of the early works of Skinner and his colleagues and the implications of this work on the rapidly developing subdiscipline of dual diagnosis. Current status and future trends are discussed.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1992 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(92)90023-y