A History of Organizational Behavior Management
OBM’s six-decade track record of data-driven performance fixes gives BCBAs a ready-made toolkit for any workplace.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Brethower et al. (2022) traced how organizational behavior management grew from small school projects into a worldwide workplace science.
They told the story year-by-year, showing how each wave of data kept the field honest and useful.
What they found
The review shows OBM’s core has stayed the same: measure performance, change contingencies, check results.
Ideas moved from classrooms to factories, hospitals, and tech firms while keeping that hard-data spirit alive.
How this fits with other research
Luke et al. (2018) said BACB rules already fit OBM, so no new license is needed. McSween (2022) later agreed and warned that pushing licensure could shrink the field. These two papers braid into the history as proof that OBM stayed open to any certified analyst.
Cymbal et al. (2024) asked 43 working OBM practitioners what graduate training should include. Their list lines up with the tools Brethower et al. highlight, showing the historical playbook is still the modern playbook.
Bottini et al. (2025) take the same tools forward, reframing burnout as behavior to assess and change. Together the trio—2018 ethics, 2024 training, 2025 new problem—extend the 2022 history into tomorrow’s practice.
Why it matters
You can trust that OBM methods you learned for autism cases transfer straight to any workplace. Use the same pinpoint, measure, and reinforce steps the review covers. When bosses ask “Is this evidence-based?” you now have a 60-year timeline to show why the answer is yes.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one staff behavior, count it for one shift, and deliver immediate praise for each instance above baseline.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Organizational behavior management (OBM) arose as early behavior analysts decided to use data in earnest to make the world a better place, first through education, then workplace training, and eventually through business and industry as a whole. The historical roots of the field are traced through the lessons learned by these pioneers and how their formative experiences created the tools and techniques that are common within the discipline today. This history also created a worldview and conceptual system that continues to distinguish OBM from alternative approaches and is reflected in recent publication trends seen today. As the levels of analysis, specializations, implementations, and problems faced continue to vary and expand within organizational behavior management, the mantra of performance-based empiricism has remained as a steady and consistent guide throughout the decades.
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2022 · doi:10.1080/01608061.2021.1924340