Verbal problem-solving in autism spectrum disorders: a problem of plan construction?
Autistic kids can judge a good question but can’t build an efficient search plan—give them a visible list of past questions to cut repeats and sharpen the plan.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Alderson-Day (2011) asked autistic and typical kids to play Twenty Questions. The goal was to see who could find the hidden object with the fewest questions.
Each child sat at a computer. A picture of an object appeared on screen. The child had to ask yes/no questions to narrow it down.
What they found
Autistic kids picked good single questions, but their overall search plan was messy. They asked more questions than peers and repeated ones they had already tried.
When the screen showed a list of past questions, the autistic group got a bit better. The list acted like a simple planner they did not have to hold in mind.
How this fits with other research
Rumsey (1985) saw the same struggle in adults. Highly verbal autistic men failed the Wisconsin Card Sort because they could not shift rules. The trouble is not age-specific; it follows the diagnosis.
Maryniak et al. (2025) looks like a clash at first. They report that teaching problem-solving coping helps typical kids’ quality of life but does nothing for autistic kids. The two studies agree: raw problem-solving training is not enough; you must tweak the format for ASD.
Ohan et al. (2015) adds another piece. On the Iowa Gambling Task, autistic players kept switching decks and learned slowly. Poor plan construction shows up in cards, objects, and daily coping.
Why it matters
If you run social-skills or academic groups, do not assume a child who asks smart questions can plan a whole task. Hand them a written tracker: questions asked, answers given, next options. One dry-erase sheet can cut repeats and build independence in one session.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Tape a small “Questions Asked” column on the desk; have the student write each question before they ask it.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) adopt less efficient strategies than typically developing controls (TD) on verbal problem-solving tests such as the Twenty Questions Task. This study examined the hypotheses that this can be explained by differences in (i) planning processes or (ii) selective attention. Twenty-two children with ASD and 21 TD controls matched for age (M(age) = 13:7) and cognitive ability (M(FSIQ) = 96.42) were tested on an adapted version of Twenty Questions and two planning tasks. ASD participants could recognize effective questions as well as TD participants on a forced-choice question discrimination task, but were observed to construct plans that were significantly less efficient. ASD performance was also specifically reduced when items could not be physically removed from the testing array, although this effect could be ameliorated by keeping a written record of participant questions during search. These findings indicate that ASD participants are sensitive to the within-task executive demands of Twenty Questions, but that their inefficiency in strategy relates to planning processes and question selection pretask. The implications for understanding ASD problem-solving skills and their impact on everyday functioning are discussed.
Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2011 · doi:10.1002/aur.222