Variables Influencing Physical Activity for Children With Developmental Disabilities Who Exhibit Problem Behavior
Right space plus a reward equals more movement and almost zero extra problem behavior for kids with autism.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Livingston et al. (2025) asked a simple question. Which activity setups and rewards get kids with autism moving?
They used a multielement design. This means they quickly switched conditions to see what worked best.
Children had problem behavior and an autism diagnosis. The team tested different activity contexts plus social and nonsocial rewards.
What they found
Activity contexts plus reinforcing consequences beat the control. Kids moved more when these pieces were in place.
Problem behavior stayed low. Movement went up without extra trouble.
How this fits with other research
Healy et al. (2018) already pooled 29 studies and saw moderate-to-large gains from physical activity programs. Livingston’s data line up with that big picture.
Griffith et al. (2012) showed fixed playground gear gave typical preschoolers the most exercise. Livingston extends that idea to children with autism and adds reward tactics.
Bassette et al. (2018) used an app, prompts, and praise to boost exercise in teens with autism. Livingston keeps the reward piece but swaps the tech for simpler context changes.
Why it matters
You now have a low-tech recipe: pick the right activity space and add a reinforcer. This pair beats a plain setup and keeps problem behavior low. Try it during recess, PE, or clinic play sessions. Swap in different spaces—open gym, fixed equipment, group game—and tag on a quick reward like cheers, tokens, or access to a favorite toy. Measure steps, jumps, or time moving to see the lift yourself.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one high-interest activity area, set a 3-minute movement goal, and deliver praise or a token each time the child meets it.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
ABSTRACTPhysical activity is associated with several health and non‐health‐related benefits for children with and without disabilities. Most children do not meet the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommendation of at least 60 min of moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity daily. Children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are even less likely to meet these standards than their neurotypical peers. Thus, there is a need to identify ways to combat physical inactivity by identifying variables influencing physical activity in this population. The present study assessed the effects of activity contexts (Experiment 1) and social and nonsocial consequences (Experiment 2) on physical activity and problem behavior for children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who exhibited problem behavior. In both experiments, we identified one or more conditions that effectively increased physical activity relative to a control. Additionally, little to no problem behavior was observed.
Behavioral Interventions, 2025 · doi:10.1002/bin.2067