Understanding of emotions based on counterfactual reasoning in children with autism spectrum disorders.
High-functioning kids with ASD can read faces yet fail to explain relief or contentment after a close call—so teach the 'almost bad' link directly.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Begeer et al. (2014) asked 24 high-functioning kids with ASD and 24 typical kids to explain story characters' feelings. The stories ended with relief or contentment after the character avoided a bad outcome. Kids had to say why the character felt that way. The task tested 'downward counterfactual' thinking: seeing how things could have been worse.
What they found
The ASD group scored far lower on relief and contentment items. They could name basic emotions but missed the 'it could have been worse' link. Typical kids said things like 'She's relieved because she almost missed the party.' ASD kids gave vague answers or repeated the ending without the comparison.
How this fits with other research
Sherwell et al. (2014) ran the same stories with adults and got the same negative result. The gap does not close with age, so start teaching early.
Fink et al. (2014) found no emotion-recognition deficit once verbal skill was matched. The new trouble spot is not spotting a smile, but understanding why the smile appeared after a near-miss.
Terrett et al. (2013) showed these kids also struggle to imagine future personal events. Weak counterfactual thinking may underlie both problems: they cannot picture 'what if' in past or future.
Why it matters
When you teach social skills, do not stop at 'happy, sad, angry.' Add lessons on relief, contentment, and 'could-have-been-worse' stories. Use visual flowcharts: almost → bad thing → avoided → feel good. Role-play near-miss scenes and have the client explain the emotion. This one tweak targets a hidden hole in their social-cognitive toolkit.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one 'near-miss' story to your social lesson: ask 'Why is he relieved?' and prompt the missed-disaster comparison until the client says it first.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The understanding of emotions based on counterfactual reasoning was studied in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders (n = 71) and in typically developing children (n = 71), aged 6-12 years. Children were presented with eight stories about two protagonists who experienced the same positive or negative outcome, either due to their own action or by default. Relative to the comparison group, children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder were poor at explaining emotions based on downward counterfactual reasoning (i.e. contentment and relief). There were no group differences in upward counterfactual reasoning (i.e. disappointment and regret). In the comparison group, second-order false-belief reasoning was related to children's understanding of second-order counterfactual emotions (i.e. regret and relief), while children in the high-functioning autism spectrum disorder group relied more on their general intellectual skills. Results are discussed in terms of the different functions of counterfactual reasoning about emotion and the cognitive style of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder.
Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2014 · doi:10.1177/1362361312468798