The nature of leisure in the lives of older adults with intellectual disability.
Older adults with ID get almost no leisure choice, so staff must build visible, daily pick-an-activity moments.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Jones et al. (1998) talked with older adults who have intellectual disability.
They asked how the adults spend free time and who picks the activity.
The study used open interviews so people could describe their day in their own words.
What they found
Almost every participant said staff or family choose the activity.
Very few could name a leisure moment they picked themselves.
Age-related limits like poor vision or walking pain made choices even smaller.
How this fits with other research
Fesko et al. (2012) and Sasson et al. (2018) later showed the same gap.
They found day programs rarely offer leisure menus after work ends.
Starke (2013) seems to disagree: young adults with ID reported high leisure joy.
The gap is about age, not method. Young adults still live with parents who create fun chances.
Older adults often live in staffed homes where schedules are fixed, so choice vanishes.
Why it matters
If you run or work in an adult day or residential program, add a daily "choice board."
List three possible leisure slots and let each client point, speak, or use a switch to pick.
This tiny step turns passive time into self-determined life, exactly what the elders in Jones et al. (1998) said was missing.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Post a laminated board with two leisure pictures; ask each client to touch their pick before morning break.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the nature of leisure in a sample of older adults with intellectual disability. Twenty-nine older adults participated in indepth interviews. An interview guide was utilized which included topics relating to leisure participation and social interaction in a variety of environments. Data were analysed according to the constant comparative method. The most pronounced theme that emerged from the data was lack of self-determination in leisure. Participants had few opportunities to freely choose leisure in any aspect of their lives. In many cases, opportunities for self-determined leisure were further constricted by age-related changes in the participants' lives.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1998 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00103.x