The effects of PECS teaching to Phase III on the communicative interactions between children with autism and their teachers.
Fifteen hours of PECS to Phase III quickly boosts spontaneous communication between preschoolers with autism and their teachers.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Carr et al. (2007) tested how fast PECS to Phase III would work in a real classroom.
Teachers gave 15 hours of PECS lessons over five weeks to preschoolers with autism.
A control group kept their usual program so the team could compare changes.
What they found
Kids who got PECS started far more back-and-forth exchanges with teachers.
They also made more spontaneous communication attempts than control peers.
The gains showed up after only 15 total hours of teaching.
How this fits with other research
Staddon et al. (2002) saw similar quick gains in a single elementary student, so the 2007 study replicates that success with a larger preschool group.
Galuska et al. (2006) went past Phase III and taught children to improvise requests when pictures were missing; Deborah’s work sets the stage for that next step.
ADiemer et al. (2023) later moved PECS into a community clinic with older kids, showing the method keeps working beyond preschool classrooms.
Why it matters
You can run PECS through Phase III in under a month without pulling kids out of class.
Brief daily sessions during snack or play give clear, measurable gains in initiation and interaction.
Use this paper when you need to show administrators that a short PECS block is worth the time.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Schedule three short PECS exchanges at every snack time this week and tally child-initiated picture passes.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The study investigated the impact of mastery of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) to Phase III, on the communications of children with autism. Children aged between 3 and 7 years, formed a PECS intervention group and a non-intervention control group. The intervention group received 15 h of PECS teaching over 5 weeks. Three 2-h classroom observations recorded communications between the children and their teachers. These occurred: 6 weeks before teaching; during the week immediately prior to teaching; during the week immediately following teaching. For the control group, two 2-h observations were separated by a 5-week interval without PECS teaching. Communicative initiations and dyadic interactions increased significantly between the children and teachers in the PECS group but not for the control group.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2007 · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0203-1