Teaching young adults with disabilities to respond appropriately to lures from strangers.
Classroom BST plus real-world walk-throughs teach adults with mild ID to reject stranger lures and keep the skill for months.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Cashon et al. (2013) worked with young adults who have mild intellectual disability.
The team used Behavioral Skills Training in a classroom.
They added real-world practice in stores and on sidewalks.
A multiple-baseline design showed who learned what and when.
What they found
After BST, most adults walked away when a stranger offered candy or asked for help finding a puppy.
The new skill lasted up to three months, though some days were shaky.
Community probes proved the skill worked where it counts—on actual streets.
How this fits with other research
Petit‐Frere et al. (2021) copied the idea with younger kids and poison safety.
They added least-to-most prompts and still saw strong gains, showing BST scales across ages and hazards.
Christopher et al. (1991) did something similar twenty years earlier for social skills in group homes.
Their adults learned without extra rewards, hinting that praise and feedback may be enough for safety lessons too.
Why it matters
You can run the same four-step BST package—explain, show, practice, praise—to teach stranger safety.
Schedule quick community walk-throughs so clients rehearse with real cars, real stores, and real people.
Track data weekly; if scores dip, return to the classroom for a booster role-play.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one client, script two lure scenarios, rehearse in class, then test on an actual sidewalk and log walk-away responses.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We taught 5 adults with mild intellectual disabilities to respond appropriately to lures from strangers. Skills were taught in the classroom first and then in situ. Before training, participants did not walk away from confederate strangers who tried to lure them away. Participants demonstrated appropriate responses during classroom and in situ training, although performance during assessments was somewhat inconsistent. Appropriate responses were observed during weekly maintenance probes and at follow-up assessments for up to 3 months after training.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2013 · doi:10.1080/00050069208257591