Sign language as a communication prosthesis with language-impaired children.
Add a small sign while teaching prepositions and pronouns—kids recall more words and prepositions improve the most.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with children who had trouble learning language. They picked two small word groups: prepositions like "in" and "on," and pronouns like "he" and "she."
Each child got two kinds of teaching. Some lessons used only spoken words. Other lessons paired the spoken word with a simple sign. The teachers switched the order so they could see which way worked better.
What they found
Kids learned more words and remembered them longer when speech came with a sign. Prepositions gained more than pronouns.
Speech-only lessons helped a little, but the boost faded fast. Adding a sign made the new words stick.
How this fits with other research
Hicks et al. (2011) later showed you can teach prepositions without any signs. Their students still learned, so the sign boost is helpful, not required.
Bailey et al. (1990) tried the same speech-plus-sign idea through video tapes. Live teaching beat the video for sign production, proving the teacher in the room still matters.
DeVellis et al. (1979) taught labels first and saw receptive skills grow. Konstantareas (1984) flips the focus to little grammar words, showing the old "teach expressive first" rule works for functors too.
Why it matters
If a child is stuck on words like "in," "under," or "her," show a quick sign while you say the word. Pick a simple gesture you can do every time. Prepositions respond best, so start there. One extra motion can cut practice time and keep the skill for good.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one preposition the child misses, choose a quick hand sign, and pair it with the spoken word across ten trials today.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Many language-impaired children rely on telegraphic speech for expression. Functors such as prepositions and pronouns are mostly absent from their utterances. In an experimental analogue to clinical work, 14 3- to 11-year-old children with various levels of language impairment were exposed to drawings portraying a single scene. A meaningful sentence including either a pronoun or a preposition, which the children were not spontaneously using at pretesting, was associated with each drawing. Training the children to use the functors followed one of two approaches. The experimenter either vocalized the functor, or she vocalized and signed it. Results revealed that, for both functor acquisition and functor recall, speech and sign training was superior to speech training. Type of functor trained was also important, with prepositions faring better than pronouns. Reasons for this speech facilitation through signs, and issues related to implementation, are discussed.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1984 · doi:10.1007/BF02408552