Reputation management: evidence for ability but reduced propensity in autism.
Autistic adults will manage their reputation only when you spell out the future reward.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Cage et al. (2013) asked autistic and neurotypical adults to play a donation game. Sometimes an observer watched them give money. Sometimes the observer could later give money back.
The team wanted to know if autistic adults change their giving when someone is watching. This is called reputation management.
What they found
Autistic adults only gave more when the watcher could return money later. Even then, they gave less than neurotypical adults.
Without the chance of pay-back, autistic adults gave the same small amount whether watched or alone.
How this fits with other research
O'Connor et al. (2024) used a similar money game and saw the opposite pattern. Their autistic adults gave more to strangers than neurotypical adults. The two studies seem to clash, but the difference is the rule. Eilidh’s game stressed pay-back; Ag’s game stressed fairness. Same people, different motives.
Ghosn et al. (2025) tested autistic kids with fairness games. Kids took longer to decide, showing they think hard about fairness. This backs the idea that autistic people care about fairness, not just looking good.
Capio et al. (2013) found autistic adults feel less vicarious embarrassment when a mistake is intentional. Together these papers show autistic adults use clear, rule-based cues more than subtle social signals.
Why it matters
Tell your client the exact pay-off before a social task. Say, “If you share, the other student can share back.” Vague hints like “be nice” or “people are watching” won’t boost their giving. Use plain if-then rules to turn fairness into action.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Before a group task, state the exact reciprocal rule out loud: “If you help now, they can help you next.”
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Previous research has reported that autistic adults do not manage their reputation, purportedly due to problems with theory of mind [Izuma, Matsumoto, Camerer, & Adolphs]. The current study aimed to test alternative explanations for this apparent lack of reputation management. Twenty typical and 19 autistic adults donated to charity and to a person, both when alone and when observed. In an additional manipulation, for half of the participants, the observer was also the recipient of their donations, and participants were told that this observer would subsequently have the opportunity to donate to them (motivation condition). This manipulation was designed to encourage an expectation of a reciprocal "tit-for-tat" strategy in the participant, which may motivate participants to change their behavior to receive more donations. The remaining participants were told that the person watching was just observing the procedure (no motivation condition). Our results replicated Izuma et al.'s finding that autistic adults did not donate more to charity when observed. Yet, in the motivation condition, both typical and autistic adults donated significantly more to the observer when watched, although this effect was significantly attenuated in autistic individuals. Results indicate that, while individuals with autism may have the ability to think about reputation, a reduced expectation of reciprocal behavior from others may reduce the degree to which they engage in reputation management.
Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2013 · doi:10.1002/aur.1313