Autism & Developmental

Reduced recognition of dynamic facial emotional expressions and emotion-specific response bias in children with an autism spectrum disorder.

Evers et al. (2015) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2015
★ The Verdict

Kids with ASD show a small global lag in reading moving facial emotions, but much of the gap is driven by their own response habits, not a core emotion blindness.

✓ Read this if BCBAs assessing social perception in school-age children with ASD.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with autistic adults or non-verbal toddlers.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Evers et al. (2015) showed short video clips of faces to two groups of children. One group had autism spectrum disorder. The other group was typically developing. After each clip, kids picked the emotion label that best matched the face. The task used moving faces, not still photos, to mimic real-life social cues.

02

What they found

Children with ASD scored slightly lower overall on picking the right emotion. When the team looked closer, they saw the kids with autism also had a bias. They tended to pick certain emotion words more often. Once that bias was removed, the specific emotion-by-emotion gaps mostly disappeared. The small global lag remained, but it was mild.

03

How this fits with other research

Fink et al. (2014) seems to disagree. They found no emotion-recognition gap once verbal ability was held constant. The difference is method: Elian used still photos and matched groups on language. Kris used moving faces and modeled response bias instead. The two studies together tell us task format and verbal skill both shape the scores we see.

Georgopoulos et al. (2022) updates the picture. In adults, the gap shrinks even more and stays tiny across static, dynamic, or social-scene formats. This suggests the mild deficit Kris caught in children may fade with age.

Song et al. (2018) adds detail. They showed children with ASD need stronger facial cues to spot anger, disgust, and fear. Kris saw a broader, but smaller, global effect. Together they imply training should use clear, intense examples of negative emotions while also checking each child’s response style.

04

Why it matters

Before you write “poor emotion recognition” in a report, check how the child tends to respond. If they favor one label, teach them to scan all choices. Use dynamic faces in probes to mirror real life, but keep verbal demands low. Target anger, disgust, and fear at higher intensity first, then fade to milder expressions. These tweaks give a clearer picture of true skill and keep intervention focused.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a quick bias check: present two answer choices per emotion clip and note if the child always picks one word; teach them to rule out before selecting.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
95
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
negative
Magnitude
small

03Original abstract

Emotion labelling was evaluated in two matched samples of 6-14-year old children with and without an autism spectrum disorder (ASD; N = 45 and N = 50, resp.), using six dynamic facial expressions. The Emotion Recognition Task proved to be valuable demonstrating subtle emotion recognition difficulties in ASD, as we showed a general poorer emotion recognition performance, in addition to some emotion-specific impairments in the ASD group. Participants' preference for selecting a certain emotion label, irrespective of the stimulus presented, played an important role in our results: response bias-corrected data still showed an overall decreased emotion recognition performance in ASD, but no emotion-specific impairments anymore. Moreover, ASD traits and empathy were correlated with emotion recognition performance.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2015 · doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2337-x