Production and comprehension of pronouns in individuals with autism: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Autistic learners mainly stumble on reflexive, clitic, and ambiguous pronouns, so screen and teach those forms first.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Faught et al. (2021) pooled every paper they could find on pronoun use in autism. They compared autistic speakers to neurotypical peers of the same age and language level.
The team looked at six pronoun types: personal, possessive, reflexive, clitic, and ambiguous forms. They ran a meta-analysis to see which types were hardest for autistic learners.
What they found
Autistic learners slipped most on reflexive, clitic, and ambiguous pronouns. Personal and possessive forms were no different from typical peers.
In plain words, “myself,” shortened tags like “’em,” and unclear “it” caused trouble. “I,” “you,” “my,” and “your” were usually fine.
How this fits with other research
Colle et al. (2008) first showed high-functioning adults used fewer personal pronouns in stories. The new review says those forms are actually spared; the earlier sample may have been more language-impaired.
Qi et al. (2025) found kids with ASD predict words from verb meaning but not from tone. Together with G et al., this suggests pronoun errors stem from weak social cue use, not poor grammar alone.
Allison et al. (1980) reported odd functor omission in autistic children. The 2021 review refines that picture: only certain pronouns are at risk, and the deficit is selective, not global.
Why it matters
Stop treating all pronoun mistakes as one big problem. Probe reflexive, clitic, and ambiguous forms first. Model “himself,” practice shortened tags, and clarify what “it” refers to in real time. These quick checks can sharpen your language goals and save therapy minutes.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add five trials of reflexive pronouns (e.g., “The boy hurt himself”) to your next language session and score correct usage.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This research compared pronoun use in individuals with autism and typically developing peers. Meta-analysis and systematic review of 20 selected articles were used to determine whether significant differences existed in the use of pronouns overall as well as in personal, ambiguous, possessive, reflexive, and clitic pronoun usage. Summary effects indicated significant differences between individuals with autism and their typically developing peers in the use of pronouns overall as well as in ambiguous, clitic, and reflexive pronoun usage, but not in personal and possessive pronoun usage. Results indicate wide variation in the way individuals with autism use pronouns. Since individual outcomes appear to be moderated by multiple factors, including cognitive ability, first language, and overall language development, it is recommended these be considered in assessment and treatment.
Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2021 · doi:10.1177/1362361320949103