Phonological reading skills acquisition by children with mental retardation.
Direct phonics lessons help kids with ID sound out words better than typical sight-word drills.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team ran a randomized trial with children who have intellectual disability.
One group got a phonological reading program. The other group got the usual class.
Both groups took the same word-reading tests before and after.
What they found
Kids who got the program could sound out more words than the control kids.
The gap was big enough to matter in real reading tasks.
How this fits with other research
Singh et al. (1984) showed that a quick teacher preview cuts reading errors. Eisenhower et al. (2006) now adds that full phonics lessons boost decoding itself.
Van der Bijl et al. (2006) tried sight-word drills the same year and saw only small gains. The phonics program in A et al. gave clearer, stronger results.
Lemons et al. (2015) later tailored phonics for Down syndrome and still saw gains. This pattern says the approach extends beyond the original ID sample.
Why it matters
You can teach kids with ID to decode words, not just memorize them. Use a structured phonics scope, not only sight-word lists. Start with letter-sounds, blend, then read whole words. The kids keep the skill and use it on new words.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run a five-minute phoneme-blending drill; have the child blend /c/ /a/ /t/ aloud, then read the whole word.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Twenty children with mental retardation (MR), age 7-12, completed a phonological reading skills program over approximately 10 weeks. As a result of the instruction, they were better able to sound out learned and transfer words compared to a control group matched on age, IQ, nonword reading, language comprehension, and phonemic awareness. Final sounding out was predicted by beginning reading skill in both groups, by phonemic awareness and articulation speed in the control group only, and by general language ability in the instruction group only. Neither IQ nor verbal working memory correlated significantly with final sounding out ability in either group. It is suggested that the instruction succeeded in compensating for weaknesses in phonemic awareness and speech articulation, but favored those who had better language skills.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2006 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.015