Personal experiences of the Criminal Justice System by individuals with autism spectrum disorders.
Autistic offenders say the justice world misunderstands them, yet plain routine inside prison helps them cope.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Helverschou et al. (2018) talked with nine autistic adults who had been in jail or prison.
They asked each person to tell the story of every step: arrest, court, time inside, and release.
The goal was to learn how the criminal justice system feels to someone on the spectrum.
What they found
Every person said police, lawyers, and guards did not understand autism.
Most still coped well in prison because the daily schedule was clear and never changed.
Stress and strong autistic traits were the two things most linked to why the offence happened.
How this fits with other research
Moya et al. (2022) later looked at 89 papers and mapped the same problem across six stops, from first police contact to life after release.
Storch et al. (2012) had already shown that autistic youth are charged less often and diverted more, hinting the system can show mercy when age is known.
Lewis et al. (2021) asked lawyers and found autistic clients still get fewer reasonable adjustments than the law promises, so the gap seen in 2018 is still wide open.
Why it matters
You may write court reports or consult for probation. Share that structure and clear rules help autistic adults stay calm and safe. Ask judges to add written step-by-step plans, visual schedules, and quiet spaces. These low-cost changes can cut stress and lower repeat offences.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a one-page visual schedule to any court packet you send, showing times for check-in, lunch, and wrap-up.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The processes of arrest, investigation, trial and imprisonment are often extremely difficult for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. In this study, nine offenders with autism spectrum disorders were interviewed about the circumstance surrounding the criminal acts, their views of the arrest, the police interrogation, the trial and the defence and their experiences of being in prison and/or life following the offence. The nine individuals described a range of different and often negative experiences with the Criminal Justice System. However, the majority of those given a custodial sentence coped well in prison, probably due to the high levels of structure and firm frameworks in that environment. Explanation factors associated with the offences indicated that autism spectrum disorder characteristics such as misunderstandings, obsessions and idiosyncratic beliefs and/or behaviours were frequently involved, but stress was the most common explanation provided by the participants. The findings suggest limited understanding of autism spectrum disorders within the Criminal Justice System which needs to be significantly improved in order to secure their legal protection.
Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2018 · doi:10.1177/1362361316685554