Peer Victimization and Communication Skills in Adolescents with Down Syndrome: Preliminary Findings.
Strong talking skills protect teens with Down syndrome from bullying.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Reardanz et al. (2020) asked teens with Down syndrome about bullying. They also tested how well the teens talk with others.
The team compared the teens to kids without disabilities. They wanted to see if better talking skills protect against bullying.
What they found
Teens with Down syndrome were picked on more than their peers. The ones who spoke clearly and stood up for themselves had fewer problems.
Strong talking skills acted like a shield. Weak skills left the teens open to teasing.
How this fits with other research
Delprato (2002) saw no peer-involvement gap in preschoolers with Down syndrome. Jenna’s teens faced more victimization. The gap grows with age, so watch middle-school transition closely.
Ferreri et al. (2011) mapped risk and protective factors in younger kids. Jenna’s work extends that map to adolescence. Communication stays a key lever.
Sasson et al. (2018) found teens with Down syndrome read angry faces like four-year-olds. Poor emotion reading plus weak speech equals higher bullying risk. Target both skills in one plan.
Why it matters
You can add communication goals to the IEP today. Practice short comeback phrases, joint story-telling, and emotion-labeling games. These simple drills may cut bullying more than generic social-skills groups. Track peer reports each quarter to see if the shield is working.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one functional phrase like “Stop, I don’t like that,” and rehearse it with role-play and praise until the teen uses it without prompting.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
In this preliminary study, we examined peer victimization in adolescents with Down syndrome (DS) and how it relates to language and communication skills. We modified the Childrens' Social Experience Questionnaire (Crick and Grotpeter in Dev Psychopathol 8:367-380, 1996) to better suit adolescents with DS by simplifying vocabulary and syntax, using two step interview response format. Internal reliability was adequate, and all peer victimization measures were significantly elevated compared to a typically developing sample. Further, peer victimization (especially relational victimization) correlated with speech intelligibility, pragmatic judgment, conversational behavior, and receptive vocabulary. These preliminary data suggest that having DS may put adolescents at risk for peer victimization, but having relatively good language/communication skills may be a protective factor. Further research is warranted on this topic.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2020 · doi:10.1007/s10803-019-04238-z